Kerala High Court
Con.Case(C)/596/2025 of ANILKUMAR C.K Vs V. KARTHIKA on 10 April 2025
COC.No.596/25 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CON.CASE(C) NO. 596 OF 2025 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.39683 OF 2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947
CON.CASE(C) NO. 596 OF 2025
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.39683 OF
2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
ANILKUMAR C.K, AGED 60 YEARS,
S/O.LATE KRISHNAPPAN, SRISHYLAM, HOUSE NO.
CMC21/100A OF CHERTHALA MUNICIPALITY, CHERTHALA
P.O, ALAPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN – 688 524.
BY ADVS.
P.K.SOYUZ
E.V.BABYCHAN
RESPONDENT:
V.KARTHIKA,
(FATHER’S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, CONVENOR, LOCAL LEVEL
MONITORING COMMITTEE, THURAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KRISHI BHAVAN, THURAVOOR P.O, ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN – 683 572.
Smt.Deepa.V, G.P
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 10.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Today when the matter came up for consideration, learned Government Pleader upon instruction submitted that the LLMC had already passed an order on the application submitted by the petitioner to delete the property from the Data Bank. As per the same, the application was rejected, but later, it was noticed that there were certain mistakes in that order. Therefore, a revised order was passed, by partially allowing the application of the petitioner. In such circumstances, this contempt of court case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to invoke the statutory remedies available to him. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE DG/10.4.25
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 596/2025 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure I THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.C NO. . 39683 OF 2022 DATED 11.10.2023 OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA Annexure II A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 10533 OF 2020 DATED 28.05.202 OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA