Kerala High Court
Arb.A/45/2024 of UDAYAN K Vs M/S. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD. on 10 April 2025
45 OF 2024 1 2025:KER:31369 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M. THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025/20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 ARB.A NO. 45 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10.07.2024 IN MA(ARB.) NO.3 OF 2024 OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025/20TH CHAITHRA, 1947
ARB.A NO. 45 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10.07.2024 IN MA(ARB.)
NO.3 OF 2024 OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, ALAPPUZHA
APPELLANT/RESPONDENTS IN I.A.1/2024 IN M.A.ARB 3/2024
UDAYAN K
AGED 48 YEARS
S/O MANIYAN PILLAI, CHANDAYUDETHEKKETHIL
THEKKEPPURA PADANILAM P.O., NOORANADU VILLAGE, MAVELIKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,PIN - 690529
UMAYAMMA C
AGED 68 YEARS
W/O MANIYAN PILLAI, CHANDAYUDETHEKKETHIL
THEKKEPPURA PADANILAM P.O., NOORANADU VILLAGE, MAVELIKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,, PIN - 690529
MANI P
AGED 60 YEARS
S/O PARAMESWARAN PILLAI, THUNDUMANNIL,
PADANILAM P.O., NOORANADU VILLAGE, MAVELIKARA
TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690529
BY ADVS.
S.K.SAJI
MAYAMOL T.S.
G.R.MANJU
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN I.A. NO.1/2024 IN M.ARB 3/2024
M/S. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 27-BKC, C-27, G BLOCK BANDRA, HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE FOURTH
FLOOR, THADIKARAN CENTRE, PALARIVATTOM, COCHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS AREA MANAGER & AUTHORISED
SIGNATORY PRATHYUSH, PIN - 682025
THIS ARBITRATION APPEALS HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 10.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
=============
The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the matter has become infructuous. The Arbitration Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/-
SYAM KUMAR V.M. JUDGE smm