Kerala High Court
WP(C)/12013/2025 of REJITHA KASIM Vs THE ADDL./JOINT/DEPUTY/ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER on 10 April 2025
12013 OF 2025 1 2025:KER:25157 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 12013 OF 2025 PETITIONER(S) : REJITHA KASIM, AGED 45 YEARS AMBALATHUVEETTIL HOUSE, P.O. PAVARATTY,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 12013 OF 2025
PETITIONER(S) :
REJITHA KASIM, AGED 45 YEARS
AMBALATHUVEETTIL HOUSE, P.O. PAVARATTY,
VENMANAD, CHAVAKKAD,
THRISSUR, PIN – 680 507.
BY ADVS.
K.KRISHNA
ACHYUTH MENON
NIRMAL KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S):
THE ADDL./JOINT/DEPUTY/ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,
NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE,
DELHI, PIN – 110 001.
NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI,
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(APPEALS)., PIN – 110 001.
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
......….............................................
W.P.(C) No.12013 of 2025
…................................................
Dated this the 25th day of March, 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
For the assessment year 2017-2018, petitioner has been assessed to tax of Rs.1,35,87,756/-. Contending that the said assessment is erroneous, an appeal has been preferred as Ext.P2 along with which a stay petition has also been filed. The limited relief now sought for by the petitioner is for a direction to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 appeal as well as the stay petition in a time bound manner.
2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing counsel, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction.
3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 stay petition filed in Ext.P2 appeal, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within an outer period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of. sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/25/03/2025
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12013/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD. 19-02-2025 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 16-03-2025 EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 16-03-2025