Kerala High Court
WP(C)/16864/2023 of PRASANNAKUMARI, Vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, on 10 April 2025
No.16864 of 2023 2025:KER:31598 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 16864 OF 2023 PETITIONER: PRASANNAKUMARI, AGED 59 YEARS, W/O. CHAMUNNI, AVITTAM HOUSE, MURIYAD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 16864 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
PRASANNAKUMARI,
AGED 59 YEARS, W/O. CHAMUNNI,
AVITTAM HOUSE, MURIYAD P.O.,
MURIYAD, THRISSUR, PIN - 680683
BY ADVS.
SHAKTHI PRAKASH
MUHASIN K.M.
RESPONDENTS:
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
1ST FLOOR, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE,
THRISSUR, PIN - 680003
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
IRINJALAKUDA REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
MINI CIVIL STATION, CHEMMANDA ROAD,
IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR, PIN - 680125
THE TAHSILDAR,
MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK OFFICE, MUKUNDAPURAM, CHEMMANDA ROAD, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR, PIN - 680125
THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
MURIYAD VILLAGE OFFICE, MURIYAD
PANCHAYATH – VELLILAMKUNNU ROAD,
MURIYAD P.O., THRISSUR, PIN - 680683
THE AGRICULTURE OFFICER,
MURIYAD KRISHI BHAVAN, MURIYAD P.O.,
THRISSUR, PIN - 680683
THE DIRECTOR,
KERALA STATE REMOTE SENSING AND
ENVIRONMENT CENTRE, VIKAS BHAVAN,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033
BY ADV.
SRI.T.JAYAN, GP.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 10.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition seeking to challenge Ext.P4 order issued by the 2nd respondent by which the application seeking removal of the property from the databank came to be rejected.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
3. This Court notices that it is without obtaining the report from the Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Centre (KSREC) that the impugned order is issued. Insofar as the petitioner had a contention that the property was converted much prior to the enactment of the Kerala Conservation of Paddyland and Wet Land Act, 2008, the 2nd respondent ought to have obtained the report of the KSREC. Insofar as it is not done, the impugned order requires to be set aside. Therefore, this writ petition would stand disposed of, setting aside Ext.P4 issued by the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent is directed to obtain a report from the KSREC and
pass fresh orders, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of 12 weeks from today, after hearing the petitioner also. Needless to say that the necessary fee for obtaining the report from the KSREC is to be satisfied by the petitioner. Sd/-
HARISANKAR V. MENON
JUDGE anm
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16864/2023
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 11.04.2022 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 5 APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 16.03.2022 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE MINUTES OF THE LLMC DATED 06.08.2022 WITH REGARD TO PETITIONER’S PROPERTY Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.09.2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P5 COPIES OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER