Kerala High Court
WP(C)/9964/2025 of DHILEEPKUMAR A.N., Vs REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, on 8 April 2025
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 9964 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: DHILEEPKUMAR A.N.,AGED 52 YEARS S/O. A.R. NARAYANAN, ANATTANPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHETTUPUZHA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 9964 OF 2025
PETITIONER/S:
DHILEEPKUMAR A.N.,AGED 52 YEARS
S/O. A.R. NARAYANAN, ANATTANPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHETTUPUZHA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 680012
BY ADVS.
M.R.DHANIL
SENITTA P. JOJO
RESPONDENT/S:
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
THRISSUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 680003
TAHASILDAR,
THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 680020
VILLAGE OFFICER,
PULLAZHI, THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 680012
Smt.Deepa.V, G.P
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 08.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the owner of the property having an extent of 1 Are 62 Sq. Meters comprised in Sy.No.422/1-2 in Block No.044 of Pullazhi Village in Thrissur District. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the said property was wrongly described as “paddy land” in the revenue records even though the same is not included in the Data Bank. Therefore, an application in Form 6, which is produced as Ext.P1, has been submitted by the petitioner and it is now pending consideration since 04.03.2025. The limited prayer sought by the petitioner is to direct the 1st respondent to pass orders thereon within a time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition. Accordingly it is ordered that, the 3rd respondent shall forward a report as to the nature of the property of the petitioner, to the 1st respondent or the authorized officer under Section 2(xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and
Wetland Act, 2008, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment and thereupon, the 1st respondent or the authorized officer as referred to above, shall take up Ext.P1 application and appropriate orders thereon shall be passed in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of such report. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
JUDGE rpk
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9964/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 6 APPLICATION, DATED 04/03/2025 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 04/03/2025 OF VILLAGE OFFICE PULLAZHI