Kerala High Court
WP(C)/10812/2025 of RAMDAS, Vs THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, on 8 April 2025
W.P (C) No.10812/2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 10812 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: RAMDAS, AGED 63 YEARS AGED, VAYALUVILASSERIL PUTHUVAL, NEENDAKARA P.O., KOLLAM,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 10812 OF 2025
PETITIONER/S:
RAMDAS,
AGED 63 YEARS
AGED, VAYALUVILASSERIL PUTHUVAL, NEENDAKARA P.O., KOLLAM, PIN - 691583
BY ADVS.
M.KIRANLAL
R.RAJESH (VARKALA)
MANU RAMACHANDRAN
T.S.SARATH
SAMEER M NAIR
SAILAKSHMI MENON
AASHI K. SHAJAN
MINZA FATHIMA SALIM M.
BINITHA MARIA THOMAS
KEZIL THOTTUKADAVIL CHERIAN
RESPONDENT/S:
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER,
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM, PIN - 690518
BY ADV P.C.SASIDHARAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
08.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
This writ petition has been filed essentially seeking a modification of the terms on which the petitioner was permitted to settle the liabilities by this court through judgment dated 16-12-2024 in W.P (C) No.44654/2024.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has duly and faithfully complied with the terms of the judgment in W.P (C) No.44654/2024 and only seeks a relaxation of the terms by granting further instalment, so that the petitioner can clear the liability without default.
3. The learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that the petitioner has complied with the terms of the judgment till today and if the petitioner requires any further accommodation it is for the petitioner to approach this court by filing a review petition in W.P (C) No.44654/2024.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent bank, I am of the view that the learned counsel for the respondent bank is right in submitting that if any further modification of the terms of Ext.P2 judgment in W.P (C) No.44654/2024 is required, it is for the petitioner to seek review of that judgment. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed, reserving the liberty of the petitioner to seek review of Ext.P2 judgment in W.P (C) No.44654/2024. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE AMG
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10812/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE CASE FILE OF THE WRIT PETITION NO 44654/2024 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED, 16.12.2024 IN WP(C) 44654/2024 Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 04.02.2025 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER