Kerala High Court
WP(C)/14400/2025 of JETHEESH K. EMMANUEL, Vs THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, WAYANAD on 7 April 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 14400 OF 2025 PETITIONER: JETHEESH .K.EMMANUEL AGED 42 YEARS, S/O KUNJAPPAN, KUNNUMPURATH HOUSE, MULLANKOLLI. P. O., PULPALLY WAYANAD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 14400 OF 2025
PETITIONER:
JETHEESH .K.EMMANUEL
AGED 42 YEARS, S/O KUNJAPPAN,
KUNNUMPURATH HOUSE, MULLANKOLLI. P. O.,
PULPALLY WAYANAD DISTRICT., PIN – 673 579.
BY ADV PRASAD CHANDRAN
RESPONDENTS:
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY WAYANAD
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY CIVIL STATION, KALPETTA WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN – 673 121.
THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
WAYANAD, OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT
OFFICER,CIVIL STATION, KALPETTA WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN – 673 121.
BINEESH.P.G
S/O GOPI,
PANTHAYIVATTAVALPPIL HOUSE,, PULPPALLY, WAYANAD, PIN – 673 579.
BY ADV. P.S.APPU, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 07.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:29787
WP(C) 14400/2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court apprehending that without finalising the timings, after considering the objections raised by the petitioner, as directed in Ext.P2 judgment in W.P(C) No.42704/2024, the 2nd respondent will now fix the timings in the timing conference scheduled on 10-04-2025. The petitioner prays that the objections raised by the petitioner may be considered in the timing conference proposed on 10-04-2025.
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader also. The learned Government Pleader submits that there is no basis for the apprehension of the petitioner. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader and considering the limited nature of relief sought for by the petitioner, this writ petition will stand disposed of, directing that, notwithstanding the fact that the timings had not been finalised pursuant to the direction in Ext.P2 judgment, the objection of the petitioner shall be considered in the timing conference proposed on 10-04-2025.
Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ats
WP(C) 14400/2025
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14400/2025 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF TIMING CONFERENCE SCHEDULED TO BE CONVENED ON 21.01.2025 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO. 42704 /2024 DATED 02.12.2024 Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE TIMING CONFERENCE SCHEDULED TO BE CONVENED ON 10.04.2025