Kerala High Court
Con.Case(C)/891/2025 of LEKHA GEORGE Vs MEERA. K. IAS on 7 April 2025
CON.CASE(C) NO. 891 OF 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CON.CASE(C) NO. 891 OF 2025 ARISING FROM JUDGMENT DATED 10.09.2024 IN WP(C) NO.27824 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1947
CON.CASE(C) NO. 891 OF 2025
ARISING FROM JUDGMENT DATED 10.09.2024 IN WP(C)
NO.27824 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS:
LEKHA GEORGE
AGED 55 YEARS
W/O. GEORGE P. KURIAKOSE, PULICKAL HOUSE, DOCTOR’S LANE, UC COLLEGE P.O., ALUVA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683102
BY ADVS.
ARYA ASHOKAN
AHAMMED MANZOOR K.
RESPONDENT
S / R2 AND R3 AND R6 I WPC
:
MEERA. K. IAS
(AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER), THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, K.B JACOB ROAD, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682001
BIPIN KUMAR. M
(AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER), THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LA),
COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682030
UNNIKRISHNAN
(AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER), THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,
NEDUMBASSERY KRISHIBHAVAN, MEKKAD P.O.,
ERNAKULAM, PIN – 683589
BY ADV
SMT.AMMINIKUTTY.K, SR.G.P
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 07.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Today when the matter came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader upon instructions submitted that, the application submitted by the petitioner in Form 5 is rejected as per order dated 05.04.2025. Therefore, this contempt of court case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the same. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE scs
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 891/2025 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P (C) NO. 27824/2024 DATED 10.09.2024