Kerala High Court
WP(C)/11628/2025 of SHEEJA KANNANKATTIL RAGHAVAN, Vs CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD., on 4 April 2025
W.P (C) No.11628/2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 11628 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: SHEEJA KANNANKATTIL RAGHAVAN, AGED 49 YEARS D/O. RAGHAVAN, KANNANKATTIL HOUSE,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 11628 OF 2025
PETITIONER/S:
SHEEJA KANNANKATTIL RAGHAVAN,
AGED 49 YEARS
D/O. RAGHAVAN, KANNANKATTIL HOUSE, ASHTAMICHIRA P.O., JUMA MASJID, MAREKKAD, VADAKKUM BHAGAM VILLAGE, CHALAKUDI TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680731
BY ADVS.
EBIN V.Y.
SADIK ISMAYIL
RESPONDENT/S:
CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD., CHOLA CREST, C54-55 & SUPER B-4, THIRU-VI-KA INDUSTRIAL
ESTATE, GUIND, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED OFFICER, PIN - 600032
CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD., ANSARI COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, NEAR WEST FORT HOSPITAL, WEST FORT, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, PIN - 680004
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT.T.P.RASHMY, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner has approached this Court challenging proceedings initiated under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 for recovery of the amounts due upon a loan availed by the petitioner.
2. During the course of hearing, petitioner has confined the relief to an opportunity for repaying the overdue amount in instalments and to obtain regularisation of the loan account.
3. It is submitted on behalf of the respondent bank that the petitioner committed default in repayment and the overdue amount as on 04-04-2025 is Rs.2,10,628/- (after giving credit to the amount paid by the petitioner pursuant to interim order dated 21-03-2025). It is further submitted that though proceedings for recovery have been initiated, as a matter of indulgence, the respondent bank is willing to accept repayment of the overdue amount in limited instalments and regularise the loan account.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Bank and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made as recorded above and also taking into account the fact that the petitioner has undertaken to clear off the overdue amount along with regular EMIs/instalments, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to clear off the overdue amount in six (6) equal monthly instalments first of which shall be paid on or before 30-04-2025 and thereafter, if the amount so directed is repaid within the time as directed above, to have the loan account regularised.
5. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent bank to accept repayment of the entire overdue amount of Rs.2,10,628/- along with interest, bank charges and costs from the petitioner and regularise the loan account of the petitioner in the following manner:
(i) The overdue amount of Rs.2,10,628/- together with any accrued interest, bank charges and costs shall be repaid in six equated monthly instalments;
(ii) The first instalment shall be paid on or before 30-04-2025 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before the last working day of each succeeding month;
(iii) Petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMI’s / instalments along with the instalments directed above;
(iv) In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with the law;
(v) In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE AMG
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11628/2025 RESPONDENT EXHIBITS Exhibit Ri(a) Account Statement PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE NOTICE DATED 27-02-2025