Kerala High Court
WP(C)/14076/2025 of DINEESH, Vs THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, on 4 April 2025
WP(C) NO. 14076 OF 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 14076 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: DINEESH,AGED 40 YEARS S/O. DINAKARAN, KONNAM PARAMBIL HOUSE, SAMAJAM DESOM,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 14076 OF 2025
PETITIONER/S:
DINEESH,AGED 40 YEARS
S/O. DINAKARAN, KONNAM PARAMBIL HOUSE, SAMAJAM DESOM, KODUNGSLLUR TALUK,P.O.METHALA, THRISSUR DIST., PIN - 680669
BY ADVS.
K.S.RAJESH
M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN
SINDHU K.S.
RESPONDENT/S:
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER,
THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., HEAD OFFICE AT
KOVILAKATHUPADAM, THRISSUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680022
THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REP:BY IT’S BRANCH MANAGER, KOTTAPURAM BRANCH, SANTOM
COMPLEX, KOTTAPPURAM.P.O., THRISSUR DIST., PIN - 680667
SRI. K.S.ARUNKUMAR, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court, challenging proceedings initiated by the respondent Bank under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 for recovery of the amounts due from the petitioner.
2. During the course of hearing, petitioner has confined the relief to an opportunity for repaying the overdue amount in instalments and to obtain regularisation of the loan accounts.
3. It is submitted on behalf of the respondent bank that the petitioner availed a personal loan and an ordinary loan from the respondent bank and committed default in repayment and the overdue amount, in respect of both the loans put together, as on 04.04.2025, would come to Rs.8,96,046/- (Rupees Eight lakh ninety six thousand and forty six only). It is further submitted that though proceedings for recovery have been initiated, as a matter of indulgence, the respondent bank is willing to accept repayment of the overdue amount in limited instalments and regularise the loan accounts.
4. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the submissions made as recorded above, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to repay the overdue amount of Rs.8,96,046/- (Rupees Eight lakh ninety six thousand and forty six only) along with any accrued interest, cost and charges in twelve instalments and thereafter, if the amount so directed is repaid within the time as directed above, to have the loan accounts regularised.
5. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent bank to accept repayment of the entire overdue amount of Rs.8,96,046/- (Rupees Eight lakh ninety six thousand and forty six only) along with accrued interest, cost and bank charges from the petitioner and regularise the loan account of the petitioner in the following manner:-
(i) The petitioner shall pay the overdue amount of Rs.8,96,046/- (Rupees Eight lakh ninety six thousand and forty six only) along with any accrued interest, cost and charges in twelve equated monthly instalments;
(ii) The first instalment shall be paid on or before 30.04.2025 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before the last working day of each succeeding months;
(iii) Petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMI’s/instalments along with the instalments directed above;
(iv) In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with the law;
(v) In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ajt
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14076/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 7.3.2025 ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT WITH RESPECT TO THE HOUSING LOAN Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 7.3.2025 ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT WITH RESPECT TO THE VANITHA LOAN