Kerala High Court
WP(C)/13257/2025 of SUDHEEP K G Vs THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER on 4 April 2025
WP(C) NO. 13257 OF 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 13257 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: 1 SUDHEEP K G, AGED 52 YEARS S/O GOPALAN, KARNAMKOTT HOUSE, POOKKODU VILLAGE,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 13257 OF 2025
PETITIONER/S:
SUDHEEP K G, AGED 52 YEARS
S/O GOPALAN, KARNAMKOTT HOUSE, POOKKODU VILLAGE, THOZHIYUR P.O, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR, PIN - 680520
RAJANEESH RAM, AGED 56 YEARS
S/O. SUDHEENDRAN, POOVATHUMKADAVIL HOUSE, PANANGAD, KODUNGHALLUR-THRISSUR, PIN - 680665
K MANOJ, AGED 53 YEARS
S/O GANGADHARAN MENON, KUMARAMANGHALATH, PANANGAD, KODUNGALLUR – THRISSUR, PIN - 680665
P.A. SUDHEESH, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O ARAVINDAN, PANAGATT HOUSE, S N PURAM, PANANGHAD P.O., KODUNGALLUR – THRISSUR, PIN - 680665
BY ADVS.
SAIBY JOSE KIDANGOOR
BENNY ANTONY PAREL
PRAMITHA AUGUSTINE
AFSANA KHAN
SREERAJ S. RAJARAM
SNEHA J.
ADARSH PADMANABHAN
AMAL DILEEP
RESPONDENT/S:
THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER
THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK REGIONAL OFFICE, VETTUKKATTIL BUILDING, M.G.ROAD, JOS JUNCTION , ERNAKULAM. KOCHI, PIN - 682016
THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
VELLANGALLORE BRANCH,KODUNGALLORE, THRISSUR DISTRICT- REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, PIN - 680662
BY ADVS.
Sunil Shankar A
VIDYA GANGADHARAN(K/000424/2020)
ARYA SATHEESH(K/002139/2024)
SRI. SUNIL SHANKAR, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The petitioners have approached this Court, seeking a limited relief. They pray that a direction be issued to the respondent bank to consider Exhibit P2 request for One Time Settlement , within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that there is no One Time Settlement scheme in force at present. However, it is submitted that the respondent bank will consider Exhibit P2 and give a suitable reply within a period of two weeks from today.
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank, the writ petition will stand disposed of, directing that the competent Authority of the respondent bank shall consider Exhibit P2 and take a decision thereon and such decision shall be communicated to the petitioners, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ajt
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13257/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 02.05.2023 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PROPOSAL FOR ONE TIME SETTLEMENT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ALONG WITH POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 06.12.2024