Kerala High Court
WP(C)/13623/2025 of MUHAMMED BASHEER, Vs REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR, on 3 April 2025
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 13623 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: MUHAMMED BASHEER, AGED 67 YEARS S/O MUHAMMED KOYA, KALARIKKAL MANNASHAM VEETTIL, PULLUR, THEKKANKUTTUR P.O., TIRUR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 13623 OF 2025
PETITIONER/S:
MUHAMMED BASHEER,
AGED 67 YEARS
S/O MUHAMMED KOYA, KALARIKKAL MANNASHAM VEETTIL, PULLUR, THEKKANKUTTUR P.O., TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676551
BY ADV BINU V V VEETTIL VALAPPIL
RESPONDENT/S:
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR,
OFFICE OF THE RDO, THRIKANDIYOOR ROAD, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676101
VILLAGE OFFICER,
THALAKKAD VILLAGE OFFICE, MH NAGAR, THEKKAN
KUTTOOR, VENGALOOR, THALAKKAD, MALAPPURAM
DISTRICT, PIN - 676102
OTHER PRESENT:
Smt.Amminikutty.K, Sr.G.P
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 03.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the owner of the property having an extent of 4 Ares 4 Sq. Meters comprised in Sy.No.19/8-9 in Block No.004 of Thalakkad Village in Malappuram District. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the said property was wrongly described as “paddy land” in the revenue records even though the same is not included in the Data Bank. Therefore, an application in Form 6, which is produced as Ext.P1, has been submitted by the petitioner and it is now pending consideration since 13.01.2025 The limited prayer sought by the petitioner is to direct the 1st respondent to pass orders thereon within a time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition. Accordingly it is ordered that, the 2nd respondent shall forward a report as to the nature of the property of the petitioner, to the 1st respondent or the authorized officer under Section 2(xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and
Wetland Act, 2008, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment and thereupon, the 1st respondent or the authorized officer as referred to above, shall take up Ext.P1 application and appropriate orders thereon shall be passed in accordance with law, within a period of five months from the date of receipt of such report. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
JUDGE rpk
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13623/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF FORM 6 APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT, DATED 13/01/2025