Kerala High Court

WP(C)/12451/2025 of RAJAN J., Vs UNION BANK OF INDIA, on 3 April 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF 2025 1 2025:KER:28695 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 12451 OF 2025 PETITIONER: RAJAN J., AGED 64 YEARS S/O. JOHN, SHERLY COTTAGE, RC STREET, BALARAMAPURAM P.O.,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.

THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1947

WP(C) NO. 12451 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

RAJAN J.,

AGED 64 YEARS

S/O. JOHN, SHERLY COTTAGE, RC STREET, BALARAMAPURAM

P.O., THIRUVANNATHAPURAM, PIN - 695501

BY ADV S.NIDHEESH

RESPONDENT:

UNION BANK OF INDIA,

REP. BY THE CHIEF MANAGER, KULANGARA TOWERS, KACHERITHAZHAM, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 686661

BY ADVS.

M.G.SUSSILA

B.SATHEEZ CHANDRAN(K/378/1975)

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

03.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the proceedings initiated by the respondent bank to recover the amounts due under credit facilities availed by the petitioner from the respondent bank.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had paid a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards loan liability after the filing of this Writ Petition and the petitioner may be permitted to clear the remaining liability in some installments.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits on instructions that no amount was paid by the petitioner towards the loan liability and the amount paid by the petitioner was to a dormant savings bank account of the petitioner maintained with the respondent bank. It is submitted that if the petitioner were to approach the competent authority of the respondent bank, a decision can be taken on the question as to whether the petitioner can be permitted to clear the liability in some installments and also whether any concession can be given to the petitioner in the matter of interest etc.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent bank, this Writ Petition will stand disposed of directing that if the petitioner were to submit a proposal for settlement of liability to the competent authority of the respondent bank by 5 pm on 07.04.2025, the competent authority shall take a decision on such proposal. Till such time as a decision is taken on the proposal to be submitted by the petitioner, further proceedings under the SARFAESI Act shall remain suspended. All contentions are left open. sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE Nsd

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12451/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6.3.2025 IN M.C 206/2025 OF THE CJM TRIVANDRUM Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER DATED 21.3.2025

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead