Kerala High Court
WP(C)/13745/2025 of BIJU C. PAUL, Vs REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER, on 3 April 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 13745 OF 2025 PETITIONER: BIJU C. PAUL, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. C.P. PAULOSE, CHENNAMKULATHIL HOUSE, ARAKKUNNAM P.O., OOZHAKODE,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 13745 OF 2025
PETITIONER:
BIJU C. PAUL,
AGED 45 YEARS,
S/O. C.P. PAULOSE, CHENNAMKULATHIL HOUSE, ARAKKUNNAM P.O., OOZHAKODE, ERNAKULAM, PIN – 682313.
BY ADV S.A.ANAND
RESPONDENT:
REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER,
PASSPORT OFFICE, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KOCHI, PIN – 682020.
SRI. T.C.KRISHNA, DSGI
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is before this Court being aggrieved by the fact that his request for a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC) has not been favourably considered by the respondent.
2. The learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner is involved in a criminal case and therefore, only a Customized PCC can be issued and that too only on orders from this Court.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the respondent and having perused Exts.P2 and P3 orders of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court – I, Piravom, this writ petition will stand disposed of directing the respondent to issue a Customized PCC to the petitioner also mentioning the details of the case mentioned in Exts.P2 and P3 orders. The needful shall be done within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. The writ petition will stand disposed of accordingly. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13745/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION BEARING NO.CO2086958793525 DATED 18.03.2025 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 10.03.2025 ON C.M.P.NO. 677/2025 IN C.C.198/2024OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PIRAVAM Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 10.03.2025 ON C.M.P.NO. 678/2025 IN C.C.198/2024OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT,PIRAVAM Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.SCN/321243455/25 DATED 26.03.2025 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY TO EXT.P4 DATED 01.04.2025 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE STATUS OF EXT.P1 APPLICATION FOR POLICE CLEARANCE CERTIFICATE Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.09.2021 IN W.P(C.) NO.17204/2021