Kerala High Court

WP(C)/4480/2025 of SAJU M.S, Vs THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, on 3 April 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF 2025 1 2025:KER:30100 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 4480 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: SAJU M.S, AGED 44 YEARS S/O VALSAN, SREEVALSAM, ELATHUR, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673303 BY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.

THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1947

WP(C) NO. 4480 OF 2025

PETITIONER/S:

SAJU M.S,

AGED 44 YEARS

S/O VALSAN, SREEVALSAM, ELATHUR, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673303

BY ADVS.

RILGIN V.GEORGE

K.T.RAVEENDRAN

AKSHARA K.P.

ARATHY P.S.

MEERA J. MENON

ANAGHA MANOJ

RESPONDENT/S:

THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,

KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REGIONAL

TRANSPORT OFFICE, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673020

THE SECRETARY,

REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE, REGIONAL

TRANSPORT OFFICE, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673020

SRI. P.S.APPU, GP

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

03.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this court being aggrieved by the fact that an application filed by the petitioner for replacement of the vehicle to operate Ext.P1 permit has not been considered by the 1st respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that the existing vehicle which is operating on Ext.P1 permit is more than 20 years old and therefore, the petitioner wants to replace the vehicle with a 2024 model vehicle.

2. Heard the learned government leader also.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government pleader and having regard to the limited nature of relief now sought for by the petitioner, this Writ Petition will stand disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P4 application filed by the petitioner for replacement of vehicle in accordance with the law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The competent authority shall also consider Ext. P5 application filed by the petitioner for a temporary permit, if such application can be granted in accordance with the law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE Nsd

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4480/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT DATED 15.12.2021 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION DATED 26.11.2009 Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION PARTICULARS Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REPLACEMENT DATED 22.01.2025 Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT DATED 22.01.2025

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead