Kerala High Court

WP(C)/8814/2025 of K.AJAYAKUMAR Vs THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES on 3 April 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 8814 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: K.AJAYAKUMAR AGED 53 YEARS S/O K.KRISHNA PILLAI, RESIDING AT KARIYATTU HOUSE, KALAYAPURAM P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM, PIN -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.

THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1947

WP(C) NO. 8814 OF 2025

PETITIONER/S:

K.AJAYAKUMAR

AGED 53 YEARS

S/O K.KRISHNA PILLAI, RESIDING AT KARIYATTU HOUSE, KALAYAPURAM P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM, PIN - 691560

BY ADVS.

T.C.SURESH MENON

B.DEEPAK

ANNA ROSE

RESPONDENT/S:

THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691506

THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER

KOTTARAKKARA CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LIMITED, NO.1909, KOTTARAKKARA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691506

KOTTARAKKARA CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LIMITED

NO.1909, PULAMON BRANCH, PULAMON P.O., KOLLAM

DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY., PIN - 691531

BY ADV Swapna Vijayan

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR

ADMISSION ON 03.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED

THE FOLLOWING:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court challenging proceedings initiated under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 for recovery of the amounts due upon a business loan availed by the petitioner.

2. During the course of hearing, petitioner has confined the relief to an opportunity for repaying the overdue amount in instalments and to obtain regularisation of the loan account.

3. It is submitted on behalf of the respondent bank that the petitioner committed default in repayment and the overdue amount as on 01.04.2025 is Rs.3,12,311/-. It is further submitted that though proceedings for recovery have been initiated, as a matter of indulgence, the respondent bank is willing to accept repayment of the overdue amount in limited instalments and regularise the loan accounts.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Bank and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made as recorded above and also taking into account the fact that the petitioner has undertaken to clear off the overdue amount along with regular EMIs/instalments, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to clear off the overdue amount in twelve equal monthly instalments first of which shall be paid on or before 30.04.2025 and thereafter, if the amount so directed is repaid within the time as directed above, to have the loan account regularised.

5. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent bank to accept repayment of the entire overdue amount of Rs.3,12,311/- along with interest, bank charges and costs from the petitioner and regularise the loan account of the petitioner in the following manner:

(i) The petitioner shall pay the overdue amount of Rs.3,12,311/- together with any accrued interest, bank charges and costs in twelve equated monthly instalments;

(ii) The first instalment shall be paid on or before 30.04.2025 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before last working day of each succeeding month;

(iii) Petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMI’s/ instalments along with the instalments directed above;

(iv) In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with the law;

(v) In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P. JUDGE Scl/

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8814/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P-1 A TRUE COPY OF THIS NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, DATED 6.5.2024 Exhibit P-2 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, DATED 5.2.2025

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead