Kerala High Court
WP(C)/5508/2025 of SHAHEEN SASHI, Vs THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, on 1 April 2025
WP(C) NO. 5508 OF 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 5508 OF 2025 PETITIONER: SHAHEEN SASHI, AGED 52 YEARS S/O. SASHI K.K., ANJALI-KARUMARASSERY HOUSE,
WP(C) NO. 5508 OF 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 5508 OF 2025
PETITIONER:
SHAHEEN SASHI,
AGED 52 YEARS
S/O. SASHI K.K., ANJALI-KARUMARASSERY HOUSE, ALAPPAD, ALAPPAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 680641
BY ADVS.
M.R.DHANIL
SENITTA P. JOJO
RESPONDENTS:
THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
CORPORATION OFFICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
KERALA, PIN - 680001
SECRETARY,
THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
CORPORATION OFFICE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
KERALA, PIN – 680001
2025:KER:27814
WP(C) NO. 5508 OF 2025
BY ADV SANTHOSH P.PODUVAL, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 01.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:27814
WP(C) NO. 5508 OF 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved by non removal of the handrails fixed in front of the petitioner's building despite the fact that, as per Ext.P5 order, a decision in this regard was taken by the 1st respondent. It is seen from Ext.P5 that, the decision to remove the handrails was taken as early as on 30.07.2024 and so far the same has not been implemented. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 also could not offer any explanation for not implementing Ext.P5 order. In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents 1 and 2 to implement Ext.P5 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE scs
WP(C) NO. 5508 OF 2025
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 5508/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE APPROVED BUILDING PLAN OF THE PETITIONER’S BUILDING DATED NIL Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS EVIDENCING THE ILLEGALLY FIXED HANDRAILS IN FRONT OF PETITIONER’S SHOP/ BUILDING DATED NIL Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS EVIDENCING THAT NO HANDRAILS FIXED IN FRONT OF CERTAIN OTHER BUILDINGS DATED NIL Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 25/07/2024 OF THE MAYOR OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES AND DECISIONS OF THE MEETING HELD ON 29.07.2024, DATED 30/07/2024