Kerala High Court

WP(C)/13236/2025 of PRASANTH V.K., Vs DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR), on 1 April 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(C) NO. 13236 OF 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 13236 OF 2025 PETITIONER: PRASANTH V.K., AGED 52 YEARS S/O.KUTTAPPAN, BASANTH SADAN,VENGOLA, ERNAKULAM,

2025:KER:27803

WP(C) NO. 13236 OF 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1947

WP(C) NO. 13236 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

PRASANTH V.K.,

AGED 52 YEARS

S/O.KUTTAPPAN, BASANTH SADAN,VENGOLA,

ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683542

BY ADV K.J.MANU RAJ

RESPONDENTS:

DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR),

COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM,

PIN - 682030

AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,

VENGOLA, KRISHI BHAVAN, VENGOLA,

KUNNATHUNAD TALUK, ERNAKULAM,

PIN - 683556

THE VILLAGE OFFICER,

VENGOLA VILLAGE OFFICE,

KUNNATHUNAD TALUK, VENGOLA P.O.,

ERNAKULAM, PIN – 683556

2025:KER:27803

WP(C) NO. 13236 OF 2025

BY ADV

SMT.DEEPA.V, G.P

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR

ADMISSION ON 01.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

2025:KER:27803

WP(C) NO. 13236 OF 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the owner in possession of property having an extent of 9.56 Ares comprised in Survey No.36/16 in Block No.20 of Vengola Village in Kunnathunad Taluk, Taluk Ernakulam District. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the property of the petitioner has been wrongfully included in the Data Bank as converted land. Therefore, the petitioner submitted Ext.P1 application in Form 5 on 13.01.2024. The limited prayer sought by the petitioner is to direct the 1st respondent to pass orders thereon within a time frame. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for the respondents, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition. Accordingly, it is ordered that, the 2nd respondent shall forward a report regarding the nature of the property of the petitioner, to the 1st respondent, the authorized officer under Section 2(xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 within a period of one month from

2025:KER:27803 WP(C) NO. 13236 OF 2025

the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Thereupon, the 1st respondent, the authorized officer as referred to above shall take up Ext.P1 application and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of such report. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE scs

2025:KER:27803 WP(C) NO. 13236 OF 2025

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13236/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 5 APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 13.1.2024 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 6.9.2023 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead