Kerala High Court
RP/254/2025 of KERALA LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. Vs MANOJ K, on 28 March 2025
of 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NITIN JAMDAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 254 OF 2025 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.11.2024 IN WA NO.961 OF 2024 OF HIGH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NITIN JAMDAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947
RP NO. 254 OF 2025
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.11.2024 IN WA NO.961 OF
2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2:
KERALA LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MUSEUM BAINS
COMPOUND, KOWDIAR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003
THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER
THE KERALA LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED
PALACE ROAD, CHEMBUKKAV, THRISSUR, PIN - 680020
BY ADV SMT.M.KABANI DINESH, SC, KERALA LAND
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS & ADDL.RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3/PETITIONER:
MANOJ K,
AGED 42 YEARS, S/O KRISHNAMOORTHY MADHAVI MANDHIRAM, THENARI P.O, ELAPPULLY PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678622
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL
DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001
MUTHALAMADA GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUTHALAMADA P.O, PALAKKAD DISTRICT- 678507
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Dated this the 28th day of March, 2025 Nitin Jamdar, C.J. Heard Ms.M.Kabani Dinesh, learned Standing Counsel for the Review Petitioner, Mr.Jacob Sebastian, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1, Mr.K.P.Harish, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the State and Mr.V.A.Johnson (Varikkappallil), learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.3.
2. Having considered the facts and circumstances, as well as the averments made in the Review Petition, we find no reason to exercise the review jurisdiction. The contention that the order is incorrect in law and on facts is not a ground for review, as the remedy lies elsewhere.
3. The Review Petition is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/-
Nitin Jamdar Chief Justice
Sd/- S. Manu Judge vgd/29.03.25
APPENDIX OF RP 254/2025 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE FURNISHED TO THE WRIT PETITIONER DURING THE HEARING ON 29.5.2023, ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION. ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE WRIT PETITIONER ON 2.6.2023 TO ANNEXURE A1, ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.