Kerala High Court
Con.Case(C)/3251/2024 of PAULSON Vs Deepa K.C. on 28 March 2025
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CON.CASE(C) NO. 3251 OF 2024 PETITIONER/S: 1 PAULSON AGED 54 YEARS S/O AUGUSTINE, MADASSERY HOUSE ANAPPARA P O., DEVAGIRI ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683577 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947
CON.CASE(C) NO. 3251 OF 2024
PETITIONER/S:
PAULSON
AGED 54 YEARS
S/O AUGUSTINE,
MADASSERY HOUSE ANAPPARA P O.,
DEVAGIRI ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
PIN - 683577
K.V.SREEDHARAN
AGED 53 YEARS
S/O VALLON,
PULIKKADAN HOUSE,
ANAPARA P.O.,
DEVAGIRI ERNAKULAM,
PIN - 683581
BY ADVS.
K.R.VINOD
M.S.LETHA
ATHIRA K.S.
JIJI C. BABY
RESPONDENT/S:
DEEPA K.C.
(AGE UNKNOWN) THE SECRETARY,
THURAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH
THURAVOOR P.O.,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
PIN - 683572
SAJEESH JOY
(AGE UNKNOWN) ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINNER,
KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,
GANDHI NAGAR, ERNAKULAM,
PIN - 682020
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner submitted this contempt of court case alleging that the respondents disobeyed the directions issued by this Court. As per the judgment, the 1st respondent herein was directed to conduct an inspection in the poultry farm of the 2nd respondent, to verify whether all the conditions prescribed in the license and consent are complied with. It was also directed that, in case there is non-compliance of the conditions, the 1st respondent shall take appropriate steps.
2. It is reported that, based on the said directions, a notice was issued to the 2nd respondent herein, which is challenged by the 2nd respondent in W.P.C No. 40220 of 2024 and the said writ petition is admitted and this Court passed an interim order on 25.02.2025 staying the said order. In such circumstances, I do not find any reason to continue the proceedings in this contempt of court case and accordingly, this contempt of court case is closed. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
JUDGE rpk
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 3251/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT W.P. (C) NO. 25931/2020 DATED 29.05.2024