Kerala High Court
Con.Case(C)/642/2025 of JEENA Vs MR. MITHUN PREMARAJ IAS., on 28 March 2025
COC.No.642/25 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CON.CASE(C) NO.642 OF 2025 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.1164 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONERS: 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947
CON.CASE(C) NO.642 OF 2025
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.1164 OF
2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS:
JEENA, AGED 39 YEARS
D/O.JANARDHANAN, IRAKKUNNATH HOUSE, VANIYAMKULAM, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
JANARDHANAN, 76 YEAR, S/O. CHANDHU, IRAKKUNNATH
HOUSE, VANIYAMKULAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN – 679
522.
SHAJI, AGED 49 YEARS,
S/O.MATTAYIL NARASYANAN, KULAPPULLI, SHORNUR II
VILLAGE, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD, REPRESENTED BY POWER
OF ATTORNEY HOLDER JANARDHANAN, S/O. CHANDHU, IRAKKUNNATH HOUSE, VANIYAMKULAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN – 679 522.
BY ADV.K.A.AUGUSTINE
RESPONDENTS:
MR.MITHUN PREMARAJ IAS.,
(AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONERS) REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OTTAPPALAM, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL
OFFICER, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD, PIN – 679 101.
Smt.Deepa.V, G.P
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Today when the matter came up for consideration the learned Government Pleader upon instruction submitted that the application submitted by the petitioner is allowed. In such circumstances, this contempt of court case is closed. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE DG/29.3.25
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 642/2025 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 . CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29/2/2024 IN WP(C ) NO. 1164/2024 OF THIS HON’BLE COURT Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 19/2/2025 CAUSED TO ISSUE BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE RESPONDENT.