Kerala High Court
Con.Case(C)/278/2025 of ABDUL LATHEEF Vs MEERA. K. IAS on 28 March 2025
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CON.CASE(C) NO. 278 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: ABDUL LATHEEF AGED 63 YEARS S/O. MEERA SAHIB, MANAGING DIRECTOR AND REPRESENTING HERCULES HOSPITALITIES PVT. LTD,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947
CON.CASE(C) NO. 278 OF 2025
PETITIONER/S:
ABDUL LATHEEF
AGED 63 YEARS
S/O. MEERA SAHIB, MANAGING DIRECTOR AND
REPRESENTING HERCULES HOSPITALITIES PVT. LTD, BAITHUL MUNNA, MANJAMALA P.O., MELTHONNAKKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695313
BY ADVS.
FARHANA K.H.
MUHASIN K.M.
RESPONDENT/S:
MEERA. K. IAS
(AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER), THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT
KOCHI REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, K.B JACOB ROAD, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682001
SINDHU P V
(AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER), THE VILLAGE OFFICER, CHENGAMANAD
VILLAGE OFFICE, KUNNUMPURAM, DESOM, ERNAKULAM, PIN
- 683102
BIPIN KUMAR M
(AGE AND FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER), THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LA),
COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682030
OTHER PRESENT:
Smt.Deepa.V, G.P
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Today when the matter came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader upon instructions submitted that, as part of processing the application submitted by the petitioner in Form 6, a demand notice dated 05.03.2025 for the conversion fee is already issued to the petitioner. It is further submitted that, on payment of the said amount, the proceedings will be finalised without any delay. The said submission is recorded and this contempt of court case is closed, leaving liberty to the petitioner to reopen this contempt of court case again, in case any cause of action arises.
Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
JUDGE rpk
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 278/2025 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P (C) NO. 18655/2024 DATED 19.06.2024 Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O. (P) NO. 140/2024/RD DATED 27.06.2024, AUTHORIZING THE 3RD RESPONDENT AS COMPETENT AUTHORITY