Kerala High Court
WP(C)/10260/2025 of R.VELLINGIRI, Vs THE SECRETARY, on 27 March 2025
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 10260 OF 2025 PETITIONER: R.VELLINGIRI, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O. RANGASWAMY GOWDER, KOPPANARI, MATTATHUKAD.P.O., KOTTATHARA, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 10260 OF 2025
PETITIONER:
R.VELLINGIRI,
AGED 61 YEARS,
S/O. RANGASWAMY GOWDER, KOPPANARI, MATTATHUKAD.P.O., KOTTATHARA, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN – 678581.
BY ADV O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENT:
THE SECRETARY,
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT
OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD, PIN – 678001.
SRI. P.S.APPU, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
27.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the fact that permit granted to the petitioner through Ext.P1 proceedings has not been issued to the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner did not produce the vehicle within the statutory time period.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that though the petitioner could not produce the vehicle within one month from the date of grant of permit, the petitioner produced the vehicle within the extended time and therefore, there is no reason to deny the issue of the permit to the petitioner after finalization of timings.
3. The learned Government Pleader fairly concedes that the petitioner had produced the vehicle within the extended time available. He submits that the permit can be issued to the petitioner after finalization of timings within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader and having regard to the
submissions made as above, this writ petition will stand disposed of directing that the permit granted to the petitioner in terms of Ext.P1 shall be issued after finalization of timings, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10260/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING OF THE RTA DATED 19.07.2024 Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 26.12.2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 THE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER EVIDENCING THE PRODUCING OF THE RECORDS OF THE VEHICLE