Madhya Pradesh High Court

FA/296/2003 of SHARAD KUMAR SONI & ORS Vs CHHTELAL AGARWAL & ORS on 19 August 2026

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

ON THE 15th OF DECEMBER, 2023

FIRST APPEAL No. 296 of 2003

BETWEEN:-

1 (a) SHARAD KUMAR SONI S/O LATE JAWAHARLAL

SONI AGED 11 YEARS

(b) SURAJ KUMAR SONI S/O LATE JAWAHARLAL SONI

AGED 9 YEARS

(c) SUDHIR KUMAR SONI S/O LATE JAWAHARLAL

SONI AGED 6 YEARS

(d) SANJAY KUMAR SONI S/O LATE JAWAHARLAL

SONI AGED 4 YEARS

(a) to (d) BEING MINOR THROUGH THEIR MOTHER

SMT. KUSUM SONI

(e) SMT. KUSUM SONI W/O LATE JAWAHARLAL SONI

AGED 38 YEARS

ALL R/O MOHALLA UPEHTI KALGA TEH. HUZUR, DISTT.

REWA (M.P.)

2. RAMESH CHAND KUMAR SONI S/O MOHANLAL

SONI AGED 25 YEARS R/O TARHATI REWA

3 (a) MOHD. JAVED S/O LATE MOHD. HANIF AGED 14

YEARS

(b) MOHD. ABID S/O LATE MOHD. HANIF AGED 12

YEARS

(a) & (b) BEING MINOR THROUGH THEIR BEGUM

JUBEDA

(c) BEGUM JUBEDA W/O LATE MOHD. HANIF AGED 38

YEARS

ALL R/O BEHIND MASJID TARHATI TEH. HUZUR DISTT.

REWA (M.P.)

.....APPELLANTS

(NONE)

AND

CHHOTELAL

AGRAWAL

S/O

KAMTA

PRASAD

AGRAWAL

2. CHINTAMANI AGRAWAL S/O KP AGRAWAL

3. RAJENDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL S/O LATE KRISHNA

SEWAK AGRAWAL AGED 36 YEARS

Page 1 of 2

Signed by: VINAY KUMAR

VERMA

Signing time: 19-12-2023

18:59:03

Signature Not Verified

(HIRDESH)

JUDGE

4. MOHANLAL AGRAWAL S/O LATE KRISHNA SEWAK

AGRAWAL AGED 34 YEARS

5. KAILASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL S/O LATE KRISHNA

SEWAK AGRAWAL AGED 32 YEARS

6. RADHELAL AGRAWAL S/O K.S. AGRAWAL AGED 30

YEARS

7. MUNNI DEVI AGRAWAL D/O K.S. AGRAWAL AGED 44

YEARS

8. PUSHPA DEVI AGRAWAL D/O K.S. AGRAWAL

9. MAYA DEVI AGRAWAL D/O K.S. AGRAWAL

10. SMT. RAM KALI AGRAWAL W/O LATE KRISHNA

SEWAK AGRAWAL

ALL R/O GARHA AZAD MARG GOGHAR TEH. HUZUR

DISTT. REWA (M.P.)

.....RESPONDENTS

(SHRI ASHUTOSH TIWARI - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT No. 10)

This appeal coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the following:

ORDER

None is appearing on behalf of the appellants today. Earlier on 08.12.2023 also none appeared on behalf of appellants. It seems that appellants are not interested in prosecuting this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. vkv /-

Signed by: VINAY KUMAR VERMA Signing time: 19-12-2023 18:59:03 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead