Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCRC/32249/2018 of RAKHI TIWARI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 14 March 2026

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SMT.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE ANJULI PALO

ON THE 26th OF APRIL, 2023

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 32249 of 2018

BETWEEN:-

1.

RAKHI TIWARI D/O SHRI KAILASH TIWARI, AGED

ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O GRAM CHHINDLI POST

BIJOURA TEH. DEORI P.S. MAHARAJPUR SAGAR

DISTT. SAGAR M.P., PRESENTLY R/O GHAMAPUR

CHOWK KARAMCHAND SQUARE P.S. BELBAGH

DISTT. JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

2.

RAKESH TIWARI S/O SHRI KAILASH TIWARI,

AGED

ABOUT

YEARS, R/O MAHARAJPUR

DISTT. SAGAR PRESENTLY GHAMAPUR CHOWK

PS BELBAGH, DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA

PRADESH)

3.

SOMESH TIWARI @ SUMIT S/O SHRI KAILASH

TIWARI,

AGED

ABOUT

Page 1 of 3

YEARS,

R/O

MAHARAJPUR

DISTT.

SAGAR

PRESENTLY

GHAMAPUR CHOWK PS BELBAGH, DISTRICT

JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

4.

SANJU @ SANJAY SONKAR S/O SHRI KESHAV

PRASAD SONKAR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

OCCUPATION: BHAN TALAIYA PREM SAGAR

ROAD PS BELBAGH, R/O BHAN TALAIYA PREM

SAGAR ROAD PS BELBAGH, DISTRICT JABALPUR

(MADHYA PRADESH)

5.

SMT. NIDHI TIWARI W/O SHRI SOMESH TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O GRAM CHHINDLI PS

MAHARAJPUR DITT. SAGAR PRESENTLY BAIL KA

BAGICHA

1ST

GALI,

GHAMAPUR,

DISTRICT

JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....APPLICANTS

(NONE)

AND

1.

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH

POLICE STATION BELBAGH JABALPUR (MADHYA

Page 2 of 3

SAN

Signature Not Verified

(SMT. ANJULI PALO)

JUDGE

PRADESH)

2.

SMT. SAVITA BAGDI W/O SHRI RAJARAM BAGDI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, INFRONT OF BADI

KHERMAI,

H.NO.

509,

PS

HANUMANTAL,

DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS

(BY MS. MAMTA MISHRA - PANEL LAWYER FOR THE STATE)

This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

This petition is pending since 2018. Today, no one is present on behalf of the applicants. On last date of hearing i.e. 19.11.2019, none has appeared on behalf of applicants. Since no one is present to prosecute the petition, hence, this M.Cr.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution. Nitesh

SAN

SAN

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead