Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/25466/2003 of P.N. SAXENA Vs THE CHIEF SECRETARY on 22 January 2026
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT
ON THE 29th OF JANUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 25466 of 2003
BETWEEN:-
1. P.N. SAXENA S/O LATE S.L. SAXENA, AGE
42 YEARS, ASSTT. GRADE-II, DEPARTMENT
OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, BHOPAL.
2. MAHENDRA SONONE, S/O M.S. SONONE,
AGE 38 YEARS, SECTION OFFICER,
3. RAJESH GUPTA, S/O SHRI R.D. GUPTA,
AGED 36 YEARS, PERSONNEL SECRETARY.
4. S.K. TIWARI, S/O LATE G.P. TIWARI, AGED
45 YEARS, ASSTT. GRADE-II,
5. DHARAMCHAND PATEL S/O AMARCHAND
PATEL, AGED 40 YEARS, ASSTT GRADE-II.
6. S.K. DWIVEDI S/O C.M. DWIVEDI, AGED 45
YEARS, ASSTT. GRADE-II.
7. AVON KMAR DHURVE S/O LATE B.S.
DHURVE,
AGED
YEARS,
ASSISTANT
GRADE-II.
8. JANAK SINGH S/O NANULAL AGED 36
YEARS, ASSISTANT GRADE-III.
9. NAMDEV DIGRASE, S/O SHRI RAJARAMNI
DIGRASE,
AGED
Page 1 of 3
YEARS,
ASSISTANT
GRADE-III.
10. KU. CHHAYA LONARE D/O PRABHUDAS
LONARE, AGED 31 YEARS, STENO TYPIST.
11. RAVINDRA MAHADIK S/O S.Y. MAHADIK,
AGED 42 YEARS, ASSTT. GRADE-I.
12. M.K. RAJONE S/O B.L. RAJONE, AGED 32
YEARS, ASSTT. GRADE-I.
13. HALKU SINGH PANDRO S/O H.L.PANDRO,
AGED 29 YEARS, L.D.C.
ALL EMPLOYEES BELONG TO OFFICE OF
THE PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, MADHYA
PRADESH,
BHOPAL,
NEAR
OLD
VIDHAN
SABHA BHAWAN, BHOPAL.
PATEL
Page 2 of 3
.....PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI K.S. WADHWA - ADVOCATE)
AND
1.
CHIEF SECRETARY, STATE OF M.P. VALLABH
BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.
STATE
OF
MADHYA
PRADESH
THROUGH
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
PARLIAMENTARY
DEPARTMENT, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.
BR IJ RAJESWAR SHRAMA, SECTION OFFICER,
OFFICE OF THE PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, M.P.
BHOPAL
(FORMER
MANAGER
M.P.
CHAIRMENSHIP
VIKAS
NIGAM)
BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
4.
KU. CHHAMA TIWARI, ASSISTANT GRADE-I,
OFFICE OF THE PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS M.P.
BHOPAL AND FORMER ASSISTANT GRADE-I,
EMPLOYEE OF M.P. LAW AND LEGISLATIVE
DEPARTMENT, BHOPAL A-4. (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY
SHRI
SUBODH
KATHAR
-
GOVT.
ADVOCATE
FOR
RESPONDENT/STATE AND SHRI HEMANT SHRIVASTAVA - ADVOCATE
FOR RESPONDENT NO.3)
This petition coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the following:
ORDER
Counsel appearing for respondent No.3 submitted that petitioner No.1 has expired 10 years ago. Counsel for petitioners does not have any instruction. In these circumstances, petition be dismissed. Counsel appearing for petitioners prays for time to argue the case. It appears that counsel appearing for petitioners has lost touch with the parties due to long passage of time. SPC was also issued earlier, but same was also not served. In these circumstances, petition is dismissed. Counsel for petitioners will be at liberty to file application for restoration
PATEL
(VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE if any of the parties approach the counsel for litigating the matter before Court. sp/-
PATEL
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…