Madhya Pradesh High Court

WP/5221/2011 of SHAMBHU SINGH GOYAL Vs CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. AND ANR. on 17 September 2025

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA

ON THE 20th OF NOVEMBER, 2023

WRIT PETITION No. 5221 of 2011

BETWEEN:-

SHAMBHU SINGH GOYAL S/O CHATAR SINGH GOYAL, AGED

ABOUT

YEARS, OCCUPATION:

SUB

DIVISIONAL

ENGINEER

BSNL,RATLAM

(MADHYA

PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER

(BY SHRI YOGESH PARASHAR, LEARNED COUNSEL)

AND

1.

CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER BHARAT SANCHAR

NIGAM

LTD.

AND

ANR. BSNL

BHAWAN,HOSHANGABAD

ROAD,BHOPAL-15

(MADHYA PRADESH)

2.

GENERAL MANAGER, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM

LTD.

KATJU

NAGAR

RATLAM (MADHYA

PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS

(SHRI VINDHYAVASHINI PRASAD KHARE, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE

RESPONDENTS NO.1 & 2)

This petition coming on for orders this day, th e court passed the following:

ORDER

The petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of order dated 05.04.2010 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur whereby the Tribunal disposed of the case of the petitioner with liberty to decide the case of the petitioner and consider for posting of the petitioner within the State of MP and the Tribunal has also passed an order regarding intervening period of the

Page 1 of 2

Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN DALAI Signing time: 21-11-2023 11:40:13 Signature Not Verified

(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE petitioner from the date of transfer to date of joining treated that period as leave admissible.

2) Counsel for the respondents submits that validity of the same order passed by Central Administrative Tribunal was challenged by the respondents in WP No.4718/2010 and the said petition was disposed off with the following order:- "Keeping in view the fact that on 10.05.2010, while issuing notice of this petition, this Court had stayed the order dated 05/04/2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in Transfer Application No.102/2009, we dispose of this petition by making the said order dated 10.05.2010 absolute till the petitioner passes a fresh transfer order with regard to the respondent. So far as the observation made by the Tribunal in paragraph 7 to the effect that <the intervening period of absence be treated as leave due and admissible= shall stand as it is."

3) Since the same order which is challenged in the present petition was challenged by the respondents and the petition has been disposed off by the Division Bench, the present petition is also disposed off in terms of the order dated 06.02.2014 passed by Division Bench in WP No.4718/2010.

4) With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed off. soumya

Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN DALAI Signing time: 21-11-2023 11:40:13 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead