Madhya Pradesh High Court

WP/6180/2021 of RAVINDRA KUMAR BHAWSAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 14 February 2025

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI

ON THE 21st OF AUGUST, 2023

WRIT PETITION No. 6180 of 2021

BETWEEN:-

RAVINDRA KUMAR BHAWSAR S/O SHRI BAPULAL

BHAWSAR, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETD.

GOVT TEACHER 177/2 SOMESHWAR MARG, SHAJAPUR

(MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER

(BY MS MEHUL SHUKLA, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER )

AND

1.

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION

DEPARTMENT, VALLABH BHAWAN (MADHYA

PRADESH)

2.

COMMISSIONER

EDUCATION

AND

PUBLIC

INSTRUCTIONS

SCHOOL

EDUCATION

D EPARTM EN T VALLABH

BHAVAN

BHOPAL

(MADHYA PRADESH)

3.

DISTRICT

EDUCATION

OFFICER SHAJAPUR

(MADHYA PRADESH)

4.

JOINT DIRECTOR OF TREASURY ACCOUNTS AND

P E N S I O N DIVISION

UJJAIN

DIST

UJJAIN

(MADHYA PRADESH)

5.

DIVISION PENSION OFFICER PENSION OFFICE

UJJAIN DIST UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS

(BY SHRI SHANTANU CHOURASIYA, PANEL LAWYER FOR THE

RESPONDENTS/STATE)

This petition coming on for order this day, th e court passed the following:

Page 1 of 2

Signed by: SEHAR HASEEN

Signing time: 8/21/2023

6:07:21 PM

Signature Not Verified

(S. A. DHARMADHIKARI)

JUDGE

ORDER

By the instant petition, the petitioner is claiming that although he stood retired on 30/06/2010 and the annual increment was to be added on 1st of July of that year, but he was not granted the said benefit.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present case has already been settled by the Supreme Court recently in Civil Appeal No.2471/2023 (The Director {Admn. and HR KPTCK and Ors. Vs. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.) wherein it has been held that benefit of annual increment which was to be added on 1st of July every year shall be paid to the employee who got retired on 30th of June of the said year, therefore, the present petitioner is also entitled to get the said benefit.

3. Considering the aforesaid and taking note of the judgment passed by Supreme Court in case of C.P. Mundinamni (Supra), this petition is allowed, directing the respondents to grant the benefit of annual increment which was to be added with effect from 01/07/2010 and recalculate the benefit of retiral dues and pension and issue fresh PPO in favour of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of submitting copy of this Court.

4. With the aforesaid, the petition stands allowed.. sh

Signed by: SEHAR HASEEN Signing time: 8/21/2023 6:07:21 PM Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead