Madhya Pradesh High Court
SA/290/2000 of E.PAUL Vs SMT.P.RAM on 10 December 2025
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL
ON THE 17th OF JULY, 2023
SECOND APPEAL No. 289 of 2000
BETWEEN:-
1. SHRI E.PAUL S/O SHRI A. PAUL, AGED ABOUT 75
YEARS,
R/O
433-AB
NAPIER
TOWN,
JABALPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY, 433-A, NAPIER
TOWN JABALPUR, M.P.
3. SMT. M. PAUL W/O SHRI E. PAUL, 433--A, NAPIER
TOWN, JABALPUR M.P.
.....APPELLANTS
(NONE)
AND
SMT.P.RAM W/O SHRI V.P. RAM, R/O BANGLOW NO.12- B, STREET NO.12, SECTOR 10 BHILAI, DISTRICT DURG
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
(NONE)
SECOND APPEAL No. 290 of 2000
BETWEEN:-
1. SHRI E.PAUL S/O SHRI A. PAUL, AGED ABOUT 75
YEARS,
R/O
433-AB
NAPIER
TOWN,
JABALPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY, 433-A, NAPIER
TOWN JABALPUR, M.P.
.....APPELLANTS
(NONE )
AND
Signed by: SWETA SAHU
Signing time: 7/18/2023
5:30:45 PM
Signature Not Verified
(DWARKA DHISH BANSAL)
JUDGE
SMT.P.RAM W/O SHRI V.P. RAM, R/O BANGLOW NO.12- B, STREET NO.12, SECTOR 10 BHILAI, DISTRICT DURG
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
(NONE)
This appeal coming on for orders this day, th e court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
None for the parties. Both the second appeals have been preferred by the appellants/defendants/tenants challenging the judgment and decree dtd.31.01.2000 passed by VI Additional District Judge, Jabalpur in CA No.1- A/1993 and 2-A/1993, whereby decree of eviction has been passed. On 17.07.2014, 23.10.2017, 29.11.2017, 29.08.2018 and 24.04.2023 also none had appeared on behalf of the appellants, therefore, it appears that the appellants have lost their interest in prosecuting the appeals. Resultantly, both the second appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim application(s), if any, shall stand dismissed. ss
Signed by: SWETA SAHU Signing time: 7/18/2023 5:30:45 PM Signature Not Verified