Madhya Pradesh High Court

WP/15613/2023 of RITIK Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 9 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL

ON THE 8th OF SEPTEMBER, 2023

WRIT PETITION No. 15613 of 2023

BETWEEN:-

RITIK S/O SHRI VEDBHUSHAN DUBEY, AGED ABOUT 25

YEARS, OCCUPATION: FARMER POKHARANI TEHSIL

KHIRKIYA DISTRICT HARDA (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER

(NONE FOR THE PETITIONER)

AND

1.

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT

VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2.

THE

COMMISSIONER

NARMADAPURAM

NARMADAPURAM DIVISION NARMADAPURAM

(MADHYA PRADESH)

3.

THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (R) KHIRKIYA

DISTRICT HARDA (MADHYA PRADESH)

4.

THE

TEHSILDAR KHIRKIYA DISTRICT HARDA

(MADHYA PRADESH)

5.

RAMDAS

S/O

CHAMPALAL R/O

POKHRANI

TEHSIL KHIRKIYA DISTRICT HARDA (MADHYA

PRADESH)

6.

RAJKUMAR S/O CHAMPALAL R/O POKHARANI

TEHSIL KHIRKIYA DISTRICT HARDA (MADHYA

PRADESH)

7.

GOUTAM S/O RAMDAS R/O POKHARANI TEHSIL

KHIRKIYA

DISTRICT

HARDA

(MADHYA

PRADESH)

8.

RAHUL S/O RAJKUMAR R/O POKHARANI TEHSIL

KHIRKIYA

DISTRICT

HARDA

(MADHYA

Signed by: VAIBHAV

YEOLEKAR

Signing time: 12-09-2023

11:15:00

Signature Not Verified

(VIVEK AGARWAL)

JUDGE

PRADESH)

9.

VIVEK S/O RAJKUMAR R/O POKHARANI TEHSIL

KHIRKIYA

DISTRICT

HARDA

(MADHYA

PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS

(SHRI ATUL DWIVEDI - PANEL LAWYER FOR THE STATE)

This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This petition is filed seeking a direction to respondent nos. 1 and 2 to remove encroachments of respondent nos. 5 to 9 in terms of the orders passed by the Revenue authorities as contained in Annexures P-2 to P-4. Thus, it is evident that this petition is filed seeking execution of the orders passed by the Tehsildar and affirmed by the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Khirkiya, District Harda and the Additional Commissioner, Narmadapuram, District Hoshangabad. Accordingly, this petition can be disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 3 to cause indulgence in the matter and get the orders of the Revenue Authorities as contained in Annexures P-2 to P-4 executed if there is no stay from any superior court within a period of thirty days and submit a report in the Registry for removal of encroachment. Later on, Shri K. S. Rajput appears and prays for marking his presence. His presence is marked. vy

Signed by: VAIBHAV YEOLEKAR Signing time: 12-09-2023 11:15:00 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead