Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCC/2275/2022 of LAXMI NARAYAN PARASHAR Vs SMT. RAJUBAI on 21 November 2025
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI
ON THE 24th OF JANUARY, 2024
MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 2275 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
LAXMI
NARAYAN
PARASHAR
S/O
LATE
SHRI
MOOLCHAND PARASHAR, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, D- 27, KOHE FIZA BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPLICANT
(BY SHRI SANJAY KUMAR PATEL - ADVOCATE )
AND
1.
SMT. RAJUBAI W/O LATE SHRI HUKUMCHAND
TAPTI
APARTMENT
T.T.
NAGAR
BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2.
KAILASH
PARASHAR
S/O
LATE
SHRI
HUKUMCHAND R/O 2 TAPTI APARTMENT T.T.
NAGAR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.
ANIL PARASHAR S/O LATE SHRI HUKUMCHAND
R/O 2 TAPTI APARTMENT T.T. NAGAR BHOPAL
4.
SMT.
MANORAMA
PASTARIYA
W/O
SHRI
KRISHNAKANT
PASTARIYA NAWRANG
TENT
HOUSE BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
5.
SMT. MADHU PASTARIYA W/O SHRI RAMAKANT
PASTARIYA R/O AAMER COMPLEX ZONE-2 MP
NAGAR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
6.
SMT.
KALABAI
W/O
LATE
SHRI
BABULAL
PARASHAR, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE
BILKHEDIA
DISTRICT
BHOPAL
(MADHYA
PRADESH)
7.
SHRI MAHESH KUMAR S/O LATE SHRI BABULAL
PARASHAR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE
BILKHEDIA
DISTRICT
BHOPAL
(MADHYA
PRADESH)
CHATURVEDI
8.
ASHOK
KUMAR
S/O
LATE
SHRI
BABULAL
PARASHAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE
BILKHEDIA
DISTRICT
BHOPAL
(MADHYA
PRADESH)
9.
DINESH KUMAR S/O LATE SHRI BABULAL
PARASHAR, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE
BILKHEDIA
DISTRICT
BHOPAL
(MADHYA
PRADESH)
10.
SMT. USHA BHARTARE W/O DR. BADARI PRASAD
BHARTARE,
AGED
ABOUT
YEARS, R/O
BHANWARGANJ BYAVARA DISTRICT RAJGARH
(MADHYA PRADESH)
11.
SMT. NIRMALA VYAS W/O PARMANAND VYAS
R/O PACHOR DISTRICT RAJGARH (MADHYA
PRADESH)
12.
SMT. REKHA DUBOLIYA W/O SHRI K. DUBOLIYA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O PATRAKAR COLONY
PALASIA INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
13.
KU. MAMTA D/O LATE SHRI BABULAL, AGED
ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O BILKHIRIA , BILKHEDA
TAHSIL HUZUR DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA
PRADESH)
14.
KU. SEEMA D/O LATE SHRI BABULAL, AGED
ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O BILKHIRIA , BILKHEDA
TAHSIL HUZUR DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA
PRADESH)
15.
SMT. RANJANA W/O LATE PRADEEP PARASHAR,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O BILKHEDA TAHSIL
HUZUR DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
16.
SHRI VAIBHAV PARASHAR S/O LATE PRADEEP
PARASHAR THROUGH ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN,
MOTHER SMT. RANJANA PARASHAR, AGED
ABOUT 13 YEARS, R/O BILKHEDA TAHSIL HUZUR
DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
17.
SHRI SAMBHAV PARASHAR S/O LATE PRADEEP
PARASHAR THROUGH ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN,
MOTHER SMT. RANJANA PARASHAR, AGED
ABOUT 10 YEARS, R/O BILKHEDA TAHSIL HUZUR
DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
CHATURVEDI
18.
SHRI
AWADNARAYAN
S/O
SHRI
BHAWANI
PRASAD DUBEY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O
VILLAGE EATKHEDI TAHSIL HUZUR DISTRICT
BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
19.
SUDHIR KUMAR S/O SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN
PARASHAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O D-27
KOHE-FIZA BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
20.
RANJAN KUMAR S/O SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN
PARASHAR, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O D-27
KOHE-FIZA BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(NONE)
This application coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This is an application seeking restoration of M.A. No.115/2017 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 02.09.2022.
2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that inadvertently, appearance could not be entered when the said M.A. was taken up for hearing. It is further contended by the learned counsel that there was peremptory order which also could not be complied with. Resultantly, this Court dismissed the M.A. on account of non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 13-04-2018.
3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the lapse for compliance of the order was bonafide and if the M.A. is restored to its original number, the said order shall be complied with within a period of fifteen days.
4. Considering the aforesaid, the MCC is allowed, subject to compliance of the common conditional order, dated 13-04-2018 within a period of thirty days from today.
CHATURVEDI
(MANINDER S. BHATTI) JUDGE
5. Office is directed to verify the factum of compliance of the order dated 13-04-2018 passed in M.A. No.115/2017.
6. Subject to compliance of the order, the M.A. No.115/2017 is restored to its original number.
7. Accordingly, the MCC stands allowed and disposed of. ac
CHATURVEDI