Madhya Pradesh High Court
MA/4095/2022 of SMT ANITA TIWARI Vs SAIF ALI MUSALMAN on 13 September 2025
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI
ON THE 23rd OF JANUARY, 2024
MISC. APPEAL No. 4095 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
1.
SMT ANITA TIWARI W/O LATE SHRI ANIL TIWARI
TRIPATHI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
HOUSE WIFE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUBEHI
THANA
DEHAT
MAIHAR
DISTRICT
SATNA
CURRENT ADDRESS UMARI SATNA THANA CIVIL
LINES TAHSIL RAGHURAJ NAGAR DISTRICT
SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.
KU. DIVYANGI TIWARI D/O LATE SHRI ANIL
TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
STUDENT R/O VILLAGE DUBEHI THANA DEHAT
MAIHAR DISTRICT SATNA CURRENT ADDRESS
UMARI SATNA THANA CIVIL LINES TAHSIL
RAGHURAJ NAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.
KU. SHIVANGI TIWARI D/O LATE SHRI ANIL
TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
STUDENT R/O VILLAGE DUBEHI THANA DEHAT
MAIHAR DISTRICT SATNA CURRENT ADDRESS
UMARI SATNA THANA CIVIL LINES TAHSIL
RAGHURAJ NAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.
RAMKRISHN TIWARI S/O LATE SHRI ANIL
TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
STUDENT MINOR THROUGH MOTHER SMT.
ANITA TIWARI R/O VILLAGE DUBEHI THANA
DEHAT MAIHAR DISTRICT SATNA CURRENT
ADDRESS UMARI SATNA THANA CIVIL LINES
TAHSIL RAGHURAJ NAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPELLANTS
(NONE)
AND
1.
SAIF ALI MUSALMAN S/O SHRI SAHJAD ALI,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE
DABHORA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
Page 1 of 2
Signed by: AKANKSHA
MAURYA
Signing time: 30-01-2024
18:12:58
Signature Not Verified
(RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI)
JUDGE
2.
KU. POOJA MISHRA D/O ARVIND DATT MISHRA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, MIG 3/3/49 NEHRUNAGAR
REWA THANA SAMAN DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
3.
NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
THROUGH DIVISIONAL MANAGER DIVISIONAL
OFFICE NEAR PARIJAT HOTEL REWA ROAD
SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.
SHRI RAJENDRA PRASAD TIWARI S/O LATE SHRI
MANGALDEEN
TIWARI R/O
VILLAGE
POST
DUBEHI
TEHSIL
MAIHAR
DISTRICT
SATNA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(NONE )
This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
ORDER
None appeared for the appellant even in the pass over round. It appears that appellant has lost interest in prosecuting this appeal. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Akm
Signed by: AKANKSHA MAURYA Signing time: 30-01-2024 18:12:58 Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…