Gujarat High Court
SCA/1603/1984 of HARISH SHARMA Vs JODHPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT on 5 December 2000
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1603 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 1603 of 1984
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- HARISH SHARMA
Versus
JODHPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR YN OZA for Petitioners
RULE SERVED for Respondent No. 1
MR LR PUJARI, AGP, for Respondent No.2
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI
and
MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
Date of decision: 05/12/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI)
The learned cousnel for the petitioners states that the grievance of the petitioners does not survive and the petitioners do not press for this petition. Petition is therefore rejected. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Interim relief stands vacated.
���***
(mohd)