Madras High Court

WP(MD)/23387/2026 of N.Muthukumar Vs The Tahsildar, on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.08.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR Writ Petition(MD)No.23387 of 2026 N.Muthukumar ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Tahsildhar, Keeranur Taluk, Pudukottai District. 2. The Taluk Surveyor, Keeranur, Pudukottai District. ..Respondents

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 13.08.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

Writ Petition(MD)No.23387 of 2026

N.Muthukumar

..Petitioner

Vs

1.The Tahsildhar,

Keeranur Taluk,

Pudukottai District.

2.The Taluk Surveyor,

Keeranur,

Pudukottai District.

..Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to forthwith conduct survey, demarcate and fix the boundaries of the petitioner's property comprised in S.F.No.309/10

A2 ad measuring to an extent of 08.86 ares situated at Vellanoor Village, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 25.07.2026.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Kamesh

For Respondents : Mrs.K.Porkodi

Special Government Pleader

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to conduct survey of the petitioner's property comprised in S.F.No.309/10 A2 with an extent of 08.86 ares situated at Vellanoor

Village, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District, by considering petitioner's representation dated 25.07.2026.

2. Heard the arguments of Mr.N.Kamesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.K.Porkodi, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. The petitioner claims right over the subject property under sale deed dated 09.08.2025. Patta for the subject property also stands in the name of the petitioner in Patta No.4317. He submitted an application on 08.07.2026 in application No.2026/0123/22/003487. However, the same has not been considered. Hence, the petitioner has come before this Court.

4. Mrs.K.Porkodi, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the application of the petitioner will be considered in accordance with law.

5. In view of the aforesaid submission, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the second respondent is directed to consider the application of the petitioner dated 08.07.2026 in application No.2026/0123/22/003487 and pass final order on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner, neighboring land owners and other interested parties, if any.

6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

13.08.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes Rmk To

1. The Tahsildhar, Keeranur Taluk, Pudukottai District.

2. The Taluk Surveyor, Keeranur, Pudukottai District.

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

Rmk

Writ Petition(MD)No.23387 of 2026

13.08.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead