Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
Smt. Meena Sharma vs BANK OF BARODA (DENA BANK) on 15 September 2026
**DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI**
**Misc. Appeal No. 117/2021**
**Arising out of SA No. 132/2014 (DRT-III, Delhi)**
**Item No. 25**
**Meena Sharma**
**V.**
**Bank of Baroda & others**
**15.09.2026 Hon'ble Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain**
Present: Sh. Manuj Aggarwal, Advocate for appellant through VC
None for respondents.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid hearing.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. 1. None has appeared on behalf of respondent no.1 since long. Hence, the respondent no.1 is proceeded *ex parte*.
2. 2. The appellant filed S.A. bearing No. 132/2014 titled as **Meena Sharma v. Bank of Baroda & others** which is stated to be now pending before DRT-I, Delhi. The DRT-III, Delhi vide order dated 03.06.2021 has refused to grant interim protection to the appellant.
3. 3. The appellant claimed to be the *bona fide* purchaser of the subject property. DRT-III, Delhi in the impugned order dated 03.06.2021 observed that the mortgaged in favour of respondent no.1 was created in the year 2005 while the appellant being the SA applicant has purchased the mortgaged property in the year 2008. The possession of the subject property was scheduled to be taken on 03.06.2021 which as per the Counsel for the appellant has not been taken so far.
4. 4. The present appeal as such does not require further adjudication and accordingly disposed of. However, the appellant shall be at liberty to file fresh application before DRT in case respondent no.1 contemplate to take possession of the subject property and in that eventuality, the respondent no.1 is directed to give 15 days' prior notice to the appellant.
5. 5. The pre-deposit, if any, made by the appellant shall be refunded back to the appellant as per rules.
\_\_\_\_\_ **(Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain)** **Chairperson**
-N