Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
PUNJAB AND SIND BANK vs M/S. DELHI AUTOMOBILES LTD on 16 September 2026
**DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI**
**Review Application No. 10/2026**
**In Misc. Appeal No. EDRAT No. 1802/2025**
**Arising out of O.A. No. 88/2004 (DRT-II, Delhi)**
**Item No. 5**
**Punjab & Sind Bank**
**V.**
**Delhi Automobiles Limited & others.**
**16.09.2026 Hon'ble Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain**
Present: Sh. Sanjeev Bhandari, Senior Advocate along with Ms. Sunidhi Gupta, Advocate for Review Applicant.
Ms. Seema Gupta, Advocate for appellant in Misc. Appeal Diary No. 1802/2025.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid hearing.
**I.A. No. 976/2026 (application for condonation of delay)**
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant application is filed for seeking condonation of delay of 19 days in filing the present review application due to the reasons as stated in the application. After considering all facts, the delay of 19 days in filing the present review application stands condoned. The application is decided accordingly.
**Review Application No. 10/2026**
2. The instant application is filed for making correction in the para-9 of the order dated 27.04.2026.
3. This Tribunal vide order dated 27.04.2026 has disposed of the Misc. Appeal bearing Diary no. 1802/2026 titled as **Punjab & Sind Bank v. Delhi Automobiles Limited & others**. The para-9 of the order dated 27.04.2026 is reproduced as under:
**"Perusal of the impugned order dated 25.08.2025 observed that the documents sought to be produced on record by the appellant were pertaining to the suit pending before the DRT-II, Delhi in OA No. 88/2004 which was filed with regard to the other account of respondent no. 5/defendant no. 5.**
**The DRT also observed that Hon'ble Delhi High Court has also directed to decide the OA within time bound manner which has already been expired."**
4. Sh. Sanjeev Bhandari, Senior Advocate along with Ms. Sunidhi Gupta, Counsel for the review applicant stated that in para-9 of the order dated 27.04.2026, the original application number was mentioned as OA No.88/2004 while the new number is given to the OA No. 24/2004. It is prayed that the necessary correction be made accordingly in para-9 in the order dated 27.04.2026.
5. Ms. Seema Gupta Counsel for the appellant stated that she does not have any objection for the said correction. Accordingly, para-9 of the order dated 27.04.2026 stands corrected and is reproduced as under:
**"Perusal of the impugned order dated 25.08.2025 observed that the documents sought to be produced on record by the appellant were pertaining to the suit pending before the DRT-II, Delhi in OA No. 88/2004 (New Number of OA is 24/2004) which was filed with regard to the other account of respondent no. 5/defendant no. 5. The DRT also observed that Hon'ble Delhi High Court has also directed to decide the OA within time bound manner which has already been expired."**
6. The aforesaid para-9 be read as part of the order dated 27.04.2026. The application is accordingly decided.
-----
- sd - **(Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain)** **Chairperson**
-P