Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
J.C. Flowers Asset Reconstruction Private Limited vs Raghuleela Developers LLP on 5 October 2026
**DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI**
**Misc. Appeal No.156/2025
Arising out of TA No.241/2022 (DRT-III, Delhi)**
**Item No.55**
**J.C. Flowers Asset Reconstruction Private Limited
V.
Raghuleela Developers LLP and others**
**05.10.2026 Hon'ble Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain**
Present: Ms. Kritika Garg, Advocate for appellant through VC
Sh. Pulkit Kapoor, Advocated for respondents no.2, 3 & 4 through VC
This matter is taken up through Hybrid hearing.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. 1. In the present appeal, the challenge is to order dated 13.05.2025 passed by DRT-III, Delhi in O.A. bearing T.A. No.241/2022 titled as **J.C. Flower Assets Reconstruction Private Limited V. Radius and Deserve Builders LLP**.
2. 2. The counsel for the appellant stated that the original application bearing T.A. No.241/2022 has already been ordered to be returned for want of territorial jurisdiction and as such the present appeal being filed to challenge the interlocutory order dated 13.05.2025 has become infructuous.
3. 3. The counsel for the appellant further stated that the present appeal does not require further adjudication in view of the fact that the original application bearing T.A. No.241/2022 is already ordered to be returned vide order dated 10.11.2025 and stated that the cost of Rs.25,000/- which was imposed by the order dated 13.05.2025 and was ordered to be deposited in Prime Minister's Relief Fund, may be waived.
4. 4. After considering all facts, the cost of Rs.25,000/- imposed vide order dated 13.05.2025 stands waived.
5. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal stands disposed of as become infructuous.
\_\_\_\_\_ **(Dr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain)** **Chairperson**
-v\$