Manipur High Court
MC(WP(C))/668/2026 of Pukrambam Radhapyari and 2 ors Vs STATE OF MANIPUR AND 3 OTHERS on 26 August 2026
COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WP(C)) No. 668 of 2026 (Ref:- WP(C) No. 220 of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
MC(WP(C)) No. 668 of 2026
(Ref:- WP(C) No. 220 of 2026)
Pukrambam Radhapyari & ors.
… Applicants
Vs.
State of Manipur & ors.
… Respondents
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
O R D E R
27-08-2026
Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the applicants submitted that in view of the order passed today in the connected writ petition, the present application may be closed as not pressed.
Recording the submission made by the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the applicants, the present application is hereby closed as not pressed.
JUDGE Devananda
IN. 63 +05'30'
Page 1 of 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 220 of 2026 Pukrambam Radhapyari & ors.
… Petitioners Vs.
State of Manipur & ors.
… Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
O R D E R
27-08-2026
Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Y. Nikhil, learned counsel appeared on behalf of petitioners; Mr. Th. Vashum, learned GA appeared on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 and Mr. Gailinpou, learned counsel representing the Advocate on record appeared on behalf of respondent No. 4 through VC platform.
The learned counsel appearing for the respondents seeks three weeks’ time for filing counter affidavit.
It has been submitted by the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners that as the petitioners are all very aged persons and they are seeking for re-calculation of their pensionary benefits, an early date may be fixed.
In view of the submission made above, registry is directed to list these cases again on 21-09-2026 instead of 21-10-2026.
Registry is directed to reflect the name of all the counsel appearing for the parties in the cause list.
JUDGE Devananda
IN. 64
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…