Manipur High Court
Arb.P./1/2026 of Taleta Hepuni Thouvei Vs M/s N.M Construction and 2 Ors on 4 August 2026
Page 1 of 2 S. Item No. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
2026:MNHC:155
S. Item No. 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
Arb.P. No. 1 of 2026
Mr. Taleta Hepuni Thouvei, aged about 30 years, S/O. TN. Hepuni, a permanent resident of Koide Makha Village, Maram, Purul Sub- Division, Senapati District, Manipur at present residing at Type – III, 51 Langol Housing Complex, P.O. & P.S. Lamphel Imphal West District, Manipur – 795004.
…. Petitioner
-versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M/s N.M Construction having its registered office address at Chingamathak Nameirakpam Leikai, Imphal West District, Manipur represented by its Managing Partner, Shri Ngangbam Rana Singh, aged about 59 years, S/O Ng. Meghachandra Singh, a resident of Chingamathak Nameirakpam Leikai, P.O. & P.S. Singjamei, Imphal West District, Manipur – 795008.
2. Ruby Ngangbam, aged about 27 years, D/O. Ngangbam Rana Singh, a resident of Chingmakha Nameirakpam Leikai, P.O. & P.S. Singjamei, Imphal West District, Manipur – 795008.
3. Riya Ngangbam, aged about 22 years, D/O. Nganbam Rana Singh, a resident of Chingmakha Nameirakpam Leikai, P.O. & P.S. Singjamei, Imphal West District, Manipur – 795008.
…. Respondents
BEFORE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR
For petitioner: Mrs. G. Pushpa, Advocate along with Ms. Helly Ch., Advocate
Date of Order: 05.08.2026
(ORDER)
When the matter was taken up Ms. G. Pushpa, learned counsel along with Ms. Helly Ch., learned counsel on record for arbitration petition petitioner was before this Court.
2026:MNHC:155
It came to light that some inadvertent errors have crept in.
Faced with the above situation, learned counsel for arbitration petition petitioner sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned arbitration petition but made a plea to preserve all the rights and contentions of the arbitration petition petitioner to file another petition with similar/same prayer on the same issue after making requisite course corrections. To be noted, this course is being adopted as it is less cumbersome compared to filing an amendment application.
A scanned reproduction of the endorsement made by learned counsel on record for arbitration petition petitioner in the case file is as follows:
In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned arbitration petition is disposed of as withdrawn/closed albeit with preservation of rights and contentions of the arbitration petition petitioner in the manner stated above. When the arbitration petition is filed afresh after making course corrections, instant order shall be annexed as an annexure. There shall be no order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE Indrajeet LAIRENMAYU M INDRAJEET SINGH Digitally signed by LAIRENMAYUM INDRAJEET SINGH Date: 2026.08.06 14:39:55 +05'30'