MC(Mat.App.)/14/2026 of SMT. MEITANKEISANGBAM (O) IBEMCHA DEVI Vs MEITANKEISANGBAM INDRAJIT SINGH REPRESENTED BY HIS LR M. ASHARANI AND 2 ORS on 24 June 2026

O R D E R

[M. Sundar, CJ]

This order will now dispose of Captioned MC (Miscellaneous Case).

Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of common order dated 22.06.2026 (yesterday) made in 4 (four) MCs (Miscellaneous Cases) viz., MC(MAT.APP.) Nos. 1, 5, 6 and 7 of 2026 which reads as follows :

‘Item No. 3 - 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL

… Applicant

- Versus -

1. Meitankeisangbam Indrajit Singh, aged about 57 years, S/o Late M. Ibotombi Singh, of Khurai Thangjam Leikai, P.O. & P.S. Porompat, Imphal East District, Manipur.

2. Shri Meitankeisangbam Binoy Singh, aged about 70 years, S/o Late M. Ibopishak Singh of Khurai Thangjam Leikai, P.O. & P.S. Porompat, Imphal East District, Manipur.

3. Shri Meitangkeisangbam Ibopishak Singh, aged about 60 years, S/o Late M. Ibotombi Singh, of Khurai Thangjam Leikai, P.O. & P.S. Porompat, Imphal East District, Manipur. … Respondents

… Applicant

- Versus -

… Applicant

- Versus -

… Applicant

- Versus -

B E F O R E HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH

For applicant : Mr. N. Jotendro, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr. Md. Murtaza Ahmed, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. Laishram Sanamacha Singh, Advocate Date of Order : 24.06.2026

O R D E R

(Oral) [M. Sundar, CJ]

This common consent order will now dispose of captioned 4 (four) ‘Miscellaneous cases’ (‘MCs’ for the sake of convenience).

Mr. Md. Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel on record for sole applicant led by Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior advocate is before this Court (Physical Court) in captioned four MCs.

One ‘Shri Meitankeisangbam Indrajit Singh’ (‘M. Indrajit Singh’ for the sake of convenience) has been arrayed as first respondent in one of the captioned MCs i.e., MC(MAT. APP.) No. 1 of 2026 but before filing the MC, Mr. M. Indrajit Singh had died and date of demise is 25.08.2024.

Mr. Laishram Sanamacha Singh, learned counsel on record for respondents in all captioned MCs submits that learned counsel is not filing affidavit/s-in-opposition and the captioned MCs are not opposed.

This Court is informed that main matrimonial appeal i.e., MAT. APP. No. 4 of 2016 pertains to guardianship qua guardianship of minors and this Court is further informed that matter is heading for settlement by resorting to mediation. In this view of the matter, without dilating more on facts and without being detained by facts, this Court deems it appropriate to write that all four captioned MCs are allowed/ordered as prayed for.

Considering the nature of the matter and also as the matter is heading for mediation, Registry to carry out necessary and consequential amendments in case files by today (24.06.2026). Registry to process MC bearing Filing No. MC(Mat. App.)/58/2026, CNR No. MNHC010000582026 with the prayer to restore MAT. APPEAL No. 4 of 2016 and MC(MAT. APP.) No. 2 of 2016 thereat and list the same tomorrow i.e., on 25.06.2026.

Captioned MCs are allowed/ordered as above. There shall be no order as to costs.

JUDGE

CHIEF JUSTICE

Bipin ’

Pursuant to afore referred order, necessary and consequential amendments have been carried out in the case file and the captioned MC has been listed before this Court today.

In the hearing today, Mr. Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel on record for MC applicant led by Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior advocate is before this Court. To be noted, MC applicant in captioned MC and appellant in main case (main case is Mat. App. No. 4 of 2016) Smt. Meitankeisangbam (O) Ibemcha Devi is present in Court.

As regards the respondents, Mr. Laishram Sanamacha Singh, learned counsel on record for all 3 (three) respondents is before this Court. To be noted, all 3 respondents viz., Smt. Asharani, Shri Meitankeisangbam Binoy Singh and Shri Meitankeisangbam Ibopishak Singh are also present in Court.

As regards the captioned MC, learned counsel on record for all respondents submits, on instructions, that he would not be filing an affidavit- in-opposition and prayer in captioned MC is not opposed.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into account the fact that prayer is innocuous besides taking into account the stated position of respondents that prayer in captioned MC is not opposed, captioned MC is allowed/ordered as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs.

JUDGE

CHIEF JUSTICE Sushil

FR/NFR

P.S. I : Upload forthwith P.S. II : All concerned will stand bound by instant order vide web copy uploaded in High Court website inter-alia as the same is QR coded.