Manipur High Court
MC(RFA)/1/2026 of ROMMEL AHONGSANGBAM Vs SURESH JAIN AND 8 OTHERS on 24 June 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL RFA No. 9 of 2019 with MC(RFA) No.
Item no. 5-12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
RFA No. 9 of 2019 with MC(RFA) No. 1 of 2026 with MC(RFA) No. 19 of 2019 with MC(RFA) No. 20 of 2019 with MC(RFA) No. 22 of 2019 with MC(RFA) No. 23 of 2019 with MC(RFA) No. 7 of 2020 with RFA No. 1 of 2020
Suresh Jain
… Appellant
- Versus -
Nongthongbam Brajamani Singh and 7 Ors.
… Respondents
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
25.06.2026
Present Ms. Y. Jinita, learned counsel for the applicant in MC(RFA) No. 1 of 2026; Mrs. G. Pushpa, learned counsel for the appellant in RFA No. 1 of 2020; Mr. I. Sandeep, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 to 7 in MC(RFA) No. 1 of 2026.
The applicant has also filed an application being MC(RFA) No. 20 of 2019 for filing 3rd party leave for preferring appeal against the impugned judgment & decree dated 17.08.2019 passed by Ld. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Imphal East, Manipur in O.S. No. 35 of 2013, 36 of 2013 & 80 of 2013. During the pendency of the application, the counsel for the appellant/applicant filed MC(RFA) No. 1 of 2026 for determining from being the counsel on behalf of the appellant as they lost contact with the appellant. It is submitted that this Court issued notice on 12.05.2026 in the application being MC(RFA) No. 1 of 2026.
Mrs. G. Pushpa, learned counsel and Mr. I. Sandeep, learned counsel for the respondents in MC(RFA) No. 1 of 2026 submit that this Court may pass appropriate order. Oinam Thoiba Meitei Digitally signed by Oinam Thoiba Meitei Date: 2026.06.26 10:29:36 +05'30'
This Court has perused the contents of the application being MC(RFA) No. 1 of 2026 and the reason for filing the same is that the counsel for the applicant/appellant has lost contact with the appellant. In the circumstances, they will not be able to pursue the matter on his behalf.
Accordingly, MC(RFA) No. 1 of 2026 is allowed and disposed of. The counsel for the appellant/applicant is discharged and determined to be their counsel in the pending applications.
Registry is directed to issue notice to the appellant (Mr. Suresh Jain) for engaging new counsel or pursuing the case in person.
List the remaining cases on 27.08.2026.
JUDGE
Thoiba