Manipur High Court

WP(C)/482/2026 of Anisul Alam Vs Union of India and 2 ors on 23 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No.482 of 2026 Anisul

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL

WP(C) No.482 of 2026

Anisul Alam … Petitioner -Versus- Union of India & 2 Ors … Respondents

BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA 24.6.2026

Heard Mr.Kh.Tarunkumar, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms.Kh.Maria, learned counsel for the petitioner.

By the present writ petition, petitioner prays for considering his case for promotion to the post of Deputy Registrar, Manipur University on the ground that he has been serving in the grade of Assistant Registrar for the last 16 years and one seat is available for promotion amongst Assistant Registrars. Petitioner has also submitted representation dated 22.5.2026 to the Registrar, Manipur University for consideration of his case for promotion as Deputy Registrar and same is pending.

It is submitted that writ petition can be disposed of at this stage by directing respondent No.2 to consider the pending representation and dispose by a speaking order within a stipulated time.

Mr.S.Vijayanand Sharma, learned Sr.PCCG on behalf of respondent No.1 submits that Ministry of Education, Government of India has nothing to do with the present writ petition and any decision in this regard is to be taken by the Manipur University.

Mr.Abhishek Prasad Sahu, learned counsel Manipur University submits that this Court may pass any appropriate order considering the limited prayer made by the petitioner.

This Court has considered the materials on record and is of considered view that writ petition can be disposed of at this stage by directing the authority of Manipur University to consider the representation. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2 to consider the pending representation dated 22.5.2026 submitted by the petitioner, as per Rule, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case.

JUDGE

Priyojit

RAJKUMA R PRIYOJIT SINGH Digitally signed by RAJKUMAR PRIYOJIT SINGH Date: 2026.06.26 10:31:50 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead