Manipur High Court
MC(Crl.A.)/25/2026 of DAISY ABUJAM Vs State of Manipur and another on 22 June 2026
25 of 2026 Page 1 Item Nos. 53 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Item Nos. 53 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
MC(Crl. A.) No. 25 of 2026 [Ref: Crl. A. No. 15 of 2026] Daisy Abujam
…Applicant/s Vrs. State of Manipur & anr
…Respondent/s
-B E F O R E- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 23.06.2026
Heard Mr. N. Umakanta, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Ms. Kathanlu Riamei, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. H. Samarjit, learned Sr. counsel and PP assisted by Mrs. R.K. Emily, learned Dy. GA appearing for the respondents. It has been submitted by the learned Sr. counsel appearing for the applicant that the applicant is one of the counsels for the appellant in accompanying Criminal Appeal No. 15 of 2026. It has been submitted that through bonafide inadvertence, while filing the above mention Criminal Appeal, a complete set of the certified copy of the impugned judgment and order has not been filed, in that, only 9 pages of the impugned Judgment and order has been filed by leaving altogether 35 pages. For rectification of the said bonafide mistake, the present application has been filed with a prayer for allowing to file the Lucy Gurum ayum Digitally signed by Lucy Gurumayum Date: 2026.06.23 16:29:27 +05'30'
remaining 35 pages of the certified copy of the impugned judgment and order along with photocopy of the said left out pages and also to allow the correction of the pagination of the memo of appeal as well as connected misc. application registered as MC(Crl. A.) No. 23 of 2026. Mr. H. Samarjit, learned Sr. counsel and PP appearing for the respondents fairly submitted that he has no objection in allowing the present application. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, this Court is of the considered view that it will be in the interest of justice to allow the present application. Accordingly, the present application is hereby allowed. The applicant or her colleague are to rectify the mistake within two days in the presence of an official of this Registry. With the aforesaid directions, the present application is disposed of.
JUDGE Lucy