Manipur High Court
WP(C)/420/2022 of JOHN LALREMRUOT SAILO Vs STATE OF MANIPUR AND 3 OTHERS on 21 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No.420 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
165 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No.420 of 2022
John Lalremruot Sailo … Petitioner -Versus- State of Manipur & 3 Ors … Respondents
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA 22.6.2026
Present Mr.Thoithoi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.S.Niranjan, learned Government Advocate for State respondent and Mr.Ch.Momon, learned counsel for respondent No.4, Manipur State Legal Services Authority.
By the present writ petition petitioner approached this Court for a compensation of Rs.9,50,000/- (Rupees nine lakh fifty thousand) only in connection with Special Trial POCSO No.3 of 2020 which was disposed of by the learned Special Judge, POCSO, Churachandpur, as the accused expired during trial. While disposing the Special POCSO case, the learned Trial Court did not pass any final order with regard to compensation even though interim order was passed.
Mr.S.Thoithoi, learned counsel for the petitioner referred to a decision of Division Bench of this court in WA No.8 of 2029 dated 6.12.2023 where applicant was permitted to approach the Manipur Legal Services Authority for compensation in terms of applicable Rules and Schemes. Mr.S.Thoithoi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that writ petition may be disposed of by giving liberty to approach the Manipur State Legal Services Authority for compensation under any appropriate Rules and Schemes.
Mr.S.Niranjan, learned Government Advocate submits that this Court may pass any appropriate order on the limited prayer made by the petitioner. Mr.Ch.Momon, learned counsel for MASLSA also submits that this Court may pass any appropriate order.
This Court has considered the materials on record. The Trial Court, due to inadvertence, did not pass any order on compensation in terms of Section 33 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
In the circumstance, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Manipur State Legal Services Authority for adequate compensation with appropriate application under applicable rules and scheme.
Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to Member Secretary, MASLSA for information.
JUDGE
Priyojit
RAJKUMA R PRIYOJIT SINGH Digitally signed by RAJKUMAR PRIYOJIT SINGH Date: 2026.06.24 10:56:52 +05'30'