Manipur High Court
CRP(C.R.P. Art.227)/40/2022 of BACHASPATIMAYUM BIRENDRA SHARMA Vs KHAIDEM MENJOR SINGH AND 2 ORS. on 3 June 2026
Item No. 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL CRP(CRP.Art.227)
Item No. 6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
CRP(CRP.Art.227) No. 40 of 2022
Bachaspatimayum Birendra Sharma, aged about 51 years, S/o (late) B. Babu Sharma of Awang Sekmai Bazar, P.O and P.S- Sekmai, Imphal West District, Manipur.
……Petitioner
Vs.
1.
Khaidem Menjor Singh, aged about 51 years, S/o (L) Kh.
Jatiswor Singh of Awang Sekmai Bazar, P.O and P.S- Sekmai, Imphal West District, Manipur.
2.
Smt. Khaidem(O) Bino Devi, aged about 66 years, W/o(L) Kh. Inakunba Singh of Awang Sekmai Bazar, P.O
and P.S- Sekmai, Imphal West District, Manipur.
3. SDC, Imphal West(N), Sekmai
……Respondents
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR
For petitioner
Mr.. F.A. Khalid , Advocate
For respondents
Mr. Kh. Santa & Mr. W. Niranjit, Advocates Date of Order 04.06.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
[1].
Mr. F.A. Khalid, learned counsel on record for revision petitioner, Mr. Kh. Santa, learned counsel on record for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and Mr. W. Niranjit, learned State counsel for respondent No.3 are before this Court (physical Court). Abujam Surjit Singh Digitally signed by Abujam Surjit Singh Date: 2026.06.05 11:57:15 +05'30'
[2].
When the captioned matter was taken up, Mr. F.A. Khalid, learned counsel on record for revision petitioner submitted that a civil suit is pending and revision petitioner would canvass his contentions therein, saying so Mr. F.A. Khalid, learned counsel for revision petitioner sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned CRP. A scanned reproduction of endorsement made by learned counsel for revision petitioner in this regard (endorsement made in case file) is as follows:
[3].
In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned CRP is disposed of as withdrawn/closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE Ab. Surjit