Manipur High Court
MC(CONT.CAS(C))/38/2026 of Kirankumar Laishram Vs The PHED Work Charged Workers Organization, Ukhrul and 2 Ors on 25 May 2026
No. 142 of 2025 MC (Cont. Cas (C)) No. 38 of 2026 Page 1 Item Nos. 44
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Cont. Cas No. 142 of 2025 MC (Cont. Cas (C)) No. 38 of 2026
Item Nos. 44 & 45 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
Cont. Cas (C) No. 142 of 2025 MC (Cont. Cas (C) No. 38 of 2026
The PHED Work Charged Workers Organization, Ukhrul …Petitioner/s Vrs. Puneet Kumar Goel; & 2 Ors. …Respondent/s
-B E F O R E- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 26.05.2026
Mr. Lungmi Ragu, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. I. Bimola, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the respondents. It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the respondents have duly complied with the direction given by this Court in its order dated 06.02.2025 passed in WP (C) No. 235 of 2023 by issuing Office Order No. 04 dated 15.04.2026. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents accordingly submitted that the present contempt case as well as the connected miscellaneous application can be closed. Mr. Lungmi Ragu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not satisfied with the order passed by the authority and as such, the petitioner may be given liberty to challenge the same. KABORAM BAM SAPANA CHANU Digitally signed by KABORAMBAM SAPANA CHANU Date: 2026.05.27 11:26:41 +05'30'
Cont. Cas No. 142 of 2025 MC (Cont. Cas (C)) No. 38 of 2026
In view of the submission made above, the present contempt case as well as the connected application are hereby closed. Needless to say that the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Office Order No. 04 dated 15.04.2026 by filing appropriate writ petition.
JUDGE Sapana