MC(WA)/18/2026 of The All Moirang Rickshaw Drivers and Pullers Co operative Society Limited and Another Vs The All Moirang CD Block E Rickshaw Development Co operative Society Ltd and 6 Others on 21 May 2026

O R D E R

[M. Sundar, CJ]

Captioned ‘MC’ (‘Miscellaneous Case’) has been filed with a prayer seeking third party leave to assail an ‘order dated 14.10.2025 made by a Hon’ble Single Bench in WP(C) No. 813 of 2023 and MC thereat’ (‘impugned Single Bench order’ for the sake of convenience). To be noted, in WP(C) No. 813 of 2023, ‘an order dated SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Digitally signed by SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Date: 2026.05.25 11:11:05 +05'30'

P a g e 2 | 5

17.03.2023 made by Executive Officer, Moirang Municipal Council, Moirang’ (‘impugned order’ for the sake of convenience) was assailed.

This order has to be read in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in the previous listing on 15.05.2026 which reads as follows : ‘15.05.2026

Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel on record for ‘Miscellaneous Case’ (‘MC’ for the sake of convenience) applicants and Ms. Ch. Sundari, learned State counsel are before this Court (physical Court).

After some arguments as the question of whether MC applicants seeking third party leave is a person aggrieved qua order dated 14.10.2025 arose.

Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel on record for MC applicants requested for a short accommodation to get further instructions and revert to this Court.

Afore- referred request for short accommodation is acceded to.

List one week hence.

List on 22.05.2026.’

Before proceeding further, it is deemed appropriate to write that MC applicant seeks to assail the Single Bench’s order by way of intra-Court appeal by third party i.e., Writ Appeal (WA) vide filing No. WA/940/2026, E-filing No. AMN20250000173C202600089, CNR No. MNHC010010542026 (filed in this Court on 02.05.2026) (‘said intended WA’ for the sake of convenience).

P a g e 3 | 5

In the hearing today, Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel on record for the MC applicant, adverting to earlier order dated 15.05.2026 set out the grievance of the MC applicant. It came to light that the MC applicant is neither aggrieved by the impugned order nor by the impugned Single Bench order. To put it differently, the grievances of MC applicant are in a different realm and the MC applicant may have to approach the Executive Officer, Moirang Municipal Council, Moirang or any other appropriate authority.

We also deem it appropriate to record that in this order we are not expressing any view or opinion about the grievances of MC applicant.

Faced with the above situation, Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel on record for MC applicant sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned MC as well as said intended WA but made a plea to preserve all the rights and contentions of the MC applicant to make a representation/approach the appropriate authorities concerned more particularly, the Executive Officer, Moirang Municipal Council, Moirang. Saying so, learned counsel on record made an endorsement in the case file and scanned reproduction of the same is as follows :

P a g e 4 | 5

P a g e 5 | 5

In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned MC as well as said intended WA filed vide filing No. WA/940/2026, E-filing No. AMN20250000173C202600089, CNR No. MNHC010010542026 filed in this Court on 02.05.2026 stand withdrawn/closed. Though obvious, it is made clear that any authority more particularly, Executive Officer of Moirang Municipal Council, Moirang, if approached, shall consider the representation of the MC application untrammeled by instant closure order. There shall be no order as to costs.

JUDGE

CHIEF JUSTICE

FR/NFR Sushil