Manipur High Court

MC(WP(C))/381/2026 of Swarendu Karmakar Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS on 20 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 362 of 2026

Item No. 9-10

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR

AT IMPHAL

WP(C) No. 362 of 2026 with

MC(WP(C) No. 381 of 2026

Swarendu Karmakar

…..Petitioner/s

-Versus-

Union of India & 4 Ors.

….Respondent/s

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

21.05.2026

Heard Mr. K. Roshan, learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner who is a constable in CRPF was appointed on 20.12.2014 and since from his initial appointment, he has been posted at different stations and he has not been posted in his home district.

From the record, it is seen that the petitioner belongs to Vill. Parbatipur, P.O. Pritinagar, P.S. Ranaghat, Dist. Nadia, (West Bengal) and he has not been posted in his home district. The petitioner submitted a representation for home posting. However, vide transfer order dated 22.12.2025, he was transferred from GC-Imphal to 051 Bn. Chandigarh. His representation for home posting was also rejected vide order dated 10.02.2026.

By the present writ petition, the petitioner submits that as per the transfer policy, i.e., standing order dated No. 04/2022 dated 27.09.2022, he is entitled for home posting.

Mr. BR. Sharma, learned CGC for the respondent, submits that the writ petition can be disposed of at this stage by permitting the petitioner to avail alternative remedy of approaching Director General, CRPF Headquarter, New Delhi by filing a fresh representation in this regard.

Mr. K. Roshan, learned counsel for the petitioner, also agrees to the proposal made by the learned CGC.

Recording the submissions made at the bar, the writ petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the Director General, CRPF Headquarter, New Delhi. The representation be filed within one week and the same shall be considered and disposed of within three weeks from the date of receipt as per applicable rules and policies.

However, this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case.

With this observation, writ petition is disposed of. Misc. application is also accordingly disposed of.

Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

JUDGE

Kh. Joshua Maring

KH. JOSHUA MARING Digitally signed by KH. JOSHUA MARING Date: 2026.05.22 10:25:04 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead