Manipur High Court

MC(RSA)/19/2023 of LISHAM ANILKUMAR SINGH AND 3 OTHERS Vs KANGJAM JAYANTA SINGH AND ANOTHER on 19 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2(1-2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL RSA No.6 of

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

31-32 a/w sup 2(1-2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL

RSA No.6 of 2024 with MC (RSA) No.34 of 2024 with MC (RSA) No.19 of 2023 with MC (RSA) No.20 of 2023

Lisham Anilkumar Singh & 3 Ors … Appellants -Versus-

Kangjam Jayanta Singh

… Respondent

BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA 20.05.2026

Present Mr.H.Prabirkumar, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant and Mr.M.Rarry, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms.Nikita, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

By the present MC (RSA) No.19 of 2023, the applicant/appellant prays for impleading one Lisham (O) Bhanumati Devi, proforma respondent in RSA No.6 of 2024.

It is submitted that proposed respondent No.2 was defendant No.5 before the Trial Court and also respondent No.5 before the First Appellate Court. Inadvertently, while filing application for condonation of delay and Second Appeal, name of proposed respondent No.2 could not be included in the memo of parties. It is submitted that respondent No.2 is necessary party in deciding the accompanying RSA.

Mr.M.Rarry, learned senior counsel for respondent No.1 submits that main RSA would be defective without making proposed respondent No.2 as party and he has objection.

This Court has considered the materials on record and proposed respondent No.2 is defendant No.5 in the Original Suit before the Trial Court and respondent No.5 in the First Appeal before the learned District Judge, as such, she is a necessary party in the Second Appeal filed by the appellant/defendant Nos.1 to 4.

Accordingly, MC (RSA) No.19 of 2023 is allowed. Lisham (O) Bhanumati Devi, aged about 79 years, w/o (late) L.Hetachandra Singh R/O Wangkhei Thambalkhong, Lisham Leirak, PO & PS Porompat, Imphal East District, Manipur, is impleaded as respondent No.2 in the accompanying RSA No.6 of 2024. Misc case is disposed of.

Registry is directed to make necessary incorporation in the main Paper Book.

Appellants are directed to file amended memo of parties on line with the physical copy.

List the remaining matters on 3.6.2026 for admission.

Issue Notice to the newly impleaded respondent No.2 by speed post and dasti, in addition within one week and file proof of affidavit for service.

MC (RSA) No.20 of 2023 is disposed of as infructuous.

JUDGE

Priyojit RAJKUMA R PRIYOJIT SINGH Digitally signed by RAJKUMAR PRIYOJIT SINGH Date: 2026.05.22 09:38:40 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead