Manipur High Court
MC(CONT.CAS(C))/7/2026 of Smt Kamala Loushambam Vs Rajkumar Dinesh Singh and 2 others on 19 May 2026
Cas (C) No. 7 of 2026 Page 1 Item Nos. 45 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
MC (Cont. Cas (C) No. 7 of 2026
Item Nos. 45 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
MC (Cont. Cas (C)) No. 7 of 2026 [Ref: Cont. Cas (C) No. 5 of 2026]
Smt. Kamala Loushambam …Applicant/s Vrs. Rajkumar Dinesh Singh; & 2 Ors. …Respondent/s
-B E F O R E- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 20.05.2026
Mr. M. Rendy, learned counsel appeared for the applicant, Mr. K. Sheityajit, learned counsel appeared for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. M. Devananda, learned senior counsel and Addl. AG assisted by Ms. Jyotsana, learned counsel appeared for respondent No. 3. None appeared on behalf of respondent No. 2. The present application has been filed for impleading Shri Ningthoujam Geoffrey, IAS, the Commissioner-cum-Secretary (Hr. & Tech. Edn.), Government of Manipur as respondent No. 3 in the connected Contempt Case (C) No. 5 of 2026 as the said officer is necessary party. Mr. M. Devananda, learned Addl. AG appearing for the respondent No. 3 submitted that as the direction has been given by KABORA MBAM SAPANA CHANU Digitally signed by KABORAMBAM SAPANA CHANU Date: 2026.05.20 17:10:26 +05'30'
MC (Cont. Cas (C) No. 7 of 2026
this Court to the said officer, he has no objection in impleading the said officer as respondent No. 3. In view of the submission made above and on perusal of the record, this Court is satisfied that Shri Ningthoujam Geoffrey, IAS, the Commissioner-cum-Secretary (Hr. & Tech. Edn.), Government of Manipur is required to be impleaded in the connected Contempt Case as respondent No. 3. Accordingly, the impleadment application is hereby allowed. Registry is directed to incorporate the name of the said officer as respondent No. 3 in the cause title of the connected Contempt Case. With the aforesaid directions, the present application stands closed.
JUDGE Sapana